MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
84,773 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Brake performance unable to be tested (1.2.1 (g))
Nearside Rear Lower Suspension arm corroded and seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Direction indicator not working (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Lower Suspension arm corroded and seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
NO ROAD TEST
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
PARTIAL TEST CARRIED OUT DUE TO REAR SUSPENSION ARMS CONDITION
eml light on
eml light on
both rear drive shafts worn in hubs
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. n/s/f lagging in operation (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Offside Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced inner and outer sills front to rear (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
suspension noisy in operation no free play visible possible front shock absorbers
Nearside Steering rack gaiter missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. n/s/f lagging in operation (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Offside Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced inner and outer sills front to rear (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
eml light on
suspension noisy in operation no free play visible possible front shock absorbers
Nearside Front Outer Subframe mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength sill near subframe mount (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced inner and outer sills front to rear (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced inner and outer sills front to rear (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
eml light on
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
eml light on
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
eml light on
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
eml light on
Front Brakes imbalanced across an axle (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Hydraulic brake calliper leaking (1.1.16 (b) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Parking brake lever defective so that it cannot be satisfactorily operated (1.1.6 (d))
Supplementary restraint system warning lamp indicates a fault (7.1.6 (a))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
eml light on
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
minor leaks from steering ram
offside rear subframe damper leaking
An item not tested (Manual)
Brake hydraulic reservoir fluid level below minimum level (3.6.G.1b)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
BONNET WILL NOT OPEN
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Power steering ram(s) has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Parking brake lever has no reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
How Reliable is the Bentley Azure?
Based on 5,991 MOT tests across 459 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
399 DD is a 2001 Bentley Azure in Silver with a 6,750cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 26 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 69.2%.
Across all 2001 Bentley Azure models, the average MOT pass rate is 85.3% with a typical mileage of 27,085 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Bentley Azure fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 121 recorded failures. If you're considering buying 399 DD, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Bentley Azure typically stays on UK roads for around 31 years. At 25 years old, this Bentley Azure is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of 399 DD?
You can check the full history of 399 DD by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was 399 DD registered?
399 DD is a 2001 Bentley Azure, first registered on 6 September 2001.
Is 399 DD safe to buy?
The MOT history for 399 DD shows 26 tests with a 69.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does 399 DD have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on 399 DD. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.