MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
17,370 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))
Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Fork stanchions (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Headlamp reflector slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Rear Valve stem slightly damaged (5.2.3 (j))
Rear reflector obviously incorrectly positioned (4.8.2 (a) (i))
Solo seat fitted at time of test, no pillion footrests
Offside Front Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Registration plate inscription illegible (0.1 (b))
Drive chain slightly tight (6.1.7 (k) (i))
Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))
Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Fork stanchions (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Headlamp reflector slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Rear Valve stem slightly damaged (5.2.3 (j))
Rear reflector obviously incorrectly positioned (4.8.2 (a) (i))
Solo seat fitted at time of test, no pillion footrests
Drive chain excessively loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Drive chain worn to excess (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Front Brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))
Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Front Shock absorber has a reduced damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Mudguard insecure ()
Rear reflector obviously incorrectly positioned (4.8.2 (a) (i))
Solo seat fitted at time of test, no pillion footrests
Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Front Mudguard insecure ()
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Fork Stanchions (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Brake lining(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear reflector obviously incorrectly positioned (4.8.2 (a) (i))
Solol seat fitted at time of test, no pillion footrests
Rear Brake grabbing severely (1.2.1 (c))
Registration plate insecure Bracket (0.1 (a))
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25% (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Rear Stop lamp remains on when the brakes are released (4.3.2 (a) (iii)) DANGEROUS
Solol seat fitted at time of test, no pillion footrests
Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Front Mudguard insecure ()
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Fork Stanchions (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Brake lining(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Rear reflector obviously incorrectly positioned (4.8.2 (a) (i))
Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))
Front Mudguard insecure ()
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Solo seat fitted at time of test, no pillion footrests
Headlamp light source and lamp not compatible (4.1.4 (c))
Registration plate inscription illegible (0.1 (b))
Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))
Front Mudguard insecure ()
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Solo seat fitted at time of test, no pillion footrests
Clutch lever pivot worn
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Front Mudguard insecure Broken ()
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Fork stanchions (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Mudguard insecure ()
Rear torque arm missing locking device
Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Registration plate lamp throwing direct white light to the rear (4.7.1 (a))
Registration plate slightly loose (0.1 (a))
Solo seat fitted at time of test, no pillion footrests
Rear Wheel bearing has excessive play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Rear Wheel spindle loose (5.2.1 (c) (i))
Rear reflector missing (4.8.2 (a) (ii))
Clutch lever pivot worn
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Front Mudguard insecure Broken ()
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Fork stanchions (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Mudguard insecure ()
Rear torque arm missing locking device
Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Registration plate lamp throwing direct white light to the rear (4.7.1 (a))
Registration plate slightly loose (0.1 (a))
Solo seat fitted at time of test, no pillion footrests
Drive chain slightly loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Shock absorber (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front tyre valve split
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swing arm (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear tyre valve perished
How Reliable is the Lexmoto Ht?
Based on 1,888 MOT tests across 513 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
AD15 JKK is a 2015 Lexmoto Ht in Grey with a 124cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 10 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 50%.
Across all 2015 Lexmoto Ht models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.9% with a typical mileage of 6,621 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Lexmoto Ht fails its MOT is tyre valve stem damaged which could cause sudden tyre deflation, accounting for 17 recorded failures. If you're considering buying AD15 JKK, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Lexmoto Ht typically stays on UK roads for around 15 years. At 11 years old, this Lexmoto Ht is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of AD15 JKK?
You can check the full history of AD15 JKK by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was AD15 JKK registered?
AD15 JKK is a 2015 Lexmoto Ht, first registered on 18 August 2015.
Is AD15 JKK safe to buy?
The MOT history for AD15 JKK shows 10 tests with a 50% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does AD15 JKK have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on AD15 JKK. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.