MOT Status
ValidMileage
53,669 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material All (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Heavily covered with under seal (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Suspension component mounting repair covered in underseal Outer sills both sides (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Sill heavily corroded at jacking point.
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Corroded. (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Sill heavily corroded at jacking point.
Various suspension and chassis components heavily corroded/deteriorated
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Sill heavily corroded at jacking point.
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Corroded. (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Sill heavily corroded at jacking point.
Various suspension and chassis components heavily corroded/deteriorated
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Various suspension and chassis components corroded/deteriorated.
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn slightly on outer edge
Offside Front Tyre worn slightly on outer edge.
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn slightly on outer edge
Offside Front Tyre worn slightly on outer edge.
Various suspension and chassis components slightly corroded.
engine covers/undertrays fitted
Front registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Rear registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
engine covers/undertrays fitted
Centre engine covers/undertrays fitted
handbrake efficiency just met legal requirment
Nearside Front Direction indicators slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Nearside Suspension arm ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Front registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
Nearside Front Direction indicators slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Nearside Suspension arm ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Accident damage to offside front corner bumper
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover excessively damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Accident damage to offside front corner bumper
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Accident damage to offside front corner bumper
Nearside rear tyre wearing on outer edge and has a nail in it
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
nail in offside front tyre
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
nearside front lower arm ball joint gaiter split
screw in nearside rear tyre
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Rover 75?
Based on 1,365,354 MOT tests across 103,127 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
AD52 HFA is a 2002 Rover 75 in Gold with a 2,497cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 29 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 72.4%.
Across all 2002 Rover 75 models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.1% with a typical mileage of 82,754 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Rover 75 fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 82,341 recorded failures. If you're considering buying AD52 HFA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Rover 75 typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 24 years old, this Rover 75 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of AD52 HFA?
You can check the full history of AD52 HFA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was AD52 HFA registered?
AD52 HFA is a 2002 Rover 75, first registered on 6 December 2002.
Is AD52 HFA safe to buy?
The MOT history for AD52 HFA shows 29 tests with a 72.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does AD52 HFA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on AD52 HFA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.