MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
100,429 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Axle swivel pins and bushes swivel pin and/or bush slightly worn (5.1.2 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Valve stem slightly damaged (5.2.3 (j))
Offside Rear Axle swivel pins and bushes swivel pin and/or bush slightly worn (5.1.2 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases rear box very rusty (6.1.2 (a))
Headlamp lens slightly defective both headlights uv damaged (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Rear Brake hose slightly deteriorated rusty (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Rear Suspension component pin or bush slightly worn rear axle bushings perished (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view split ns (3.2 (a) (i))
aux. belt perished/cracking
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases rear box very rusty (6.1.2 (a))
Headlamp lens slightly defective both headlights uv damaged (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Brake cable has restricted free movement handbrake cables poor condition. rec renewal (1.1.15 (e))
Rear Brake hose slightly deteriorated rusty (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Rear Suspension component pin or bush slightly worn rear axle bushings perished (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view split ns (3.2 (a) (i))
aux. belt perished/cracking
Front Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view crack in zone B of windscreen. (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front slight brake bind but not seriously effecting the performance.
Nearside Rear slight brake bind but not seriously effecting the performance.
Spare tyre defective missing ()
Nearside Front Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Front Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view crack in zone B of windscreen. (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front slight brake bind but not seriously effecting the performance.
Nearside Rear slight brake bind but not seriously effecting the performance.
Spare tyre defective missing ()
Car would benefit from waxoyl of subframes and axles etc
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin discs ok at present (3.5.1g)
Rear Brake pad(s) modified but not seriously weakened modified by entropy (rust) as such (3.5.1n)
Bonnet retaining device ineffective safety catch was siezed (8.4.2)
Car would benefit from waxoyl of subframes and axles etc
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin discs ok at present (3.5.1g)
Power steering fluid level below minimum now topped up (2.3.1)
Rear Brake pad(s) modified but not seriously weakened modified by entropy (rust) as such (3.5.1n)
Front Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect units faded (1.8.A.1b)
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (3.4.1c)
Power steering fluid level low, but not below minimum (2.3.1)
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules nearside + offside (3.6.B.4e)
horn modified
vehicle submitted to road test condtions
Battery WAS defective. Now new.
EML LIGHT ON
FRONT BRAKE PADS APPEAR QUITE WORN
both front tyres wearing on outer edges
brake fluid level low
engine cover & under trays fitted
front brake pads worn to approx,6mm
hand brake travel excessive
Nearside Front Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
both front tyres wearing on outer edges
brake fluid level low
engine cover & under trays fitted
front brake pads worn to approx,6mm
hand brake travel excessive
both rear tyre treads starting to perish & crack
Horn not working (1.6.2a)
Nearside Front Valve stem seriously damaged (4.1.D.1e)
Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Nearside Headlamp excessively deteriorated so that the light output is severely reduced (1.7.5a)
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Offside Front Valve stem seriously damaged (4.1.D.1e)
Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Offside Headlamp excessively deteriorated so that the light output is severely reduced (1.7.5a)
both rear tyre treads starting to perish & crack
coolant bottle insecure
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside front brake fluctuating, but not excessively (3.7.B.3)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
How Reliable is the Saab 9-5?
Based on 735,114 MOT tests across 55,671 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
AD54 YHJ is a 2004 Saab 9-5 in Red with a 2,171cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2004 Saab 9-5 models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.8% with a typical mileage of 93,098 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Saab 9-5 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 28,935 recorded failures. If you're considering buying AD54 YHJ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Saab 9-5 typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 22 years old, this Saab 9-5 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of AD54 YHJ?
You can check the full history of AD54 YHJ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was AD54 YHJ registered?
AD54 YHJ is a 2004 Saab 9-5, first registered on 11 December 2004.
Is AD54 YHJ safe to buy?
The MOT history for AD54 YHJ shows 18 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does AD54 YHJ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on AD54 YHJ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.