MOT Status
ValidMileage
183,869 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Exhaust system deteriorated
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both front brake discs deteriorated (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both front lower arms bushes deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Side repeater lens defective which has no effect on emitted light lamp damaged (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Coil spring corroded Both rears (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened rear subframe heavily corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement All rear subframe bushes deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive All rear subframe mounting areas corroded (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened All rear suspension arms corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement All rear suspension arms bushes deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Drop link arm upper ball joint gaiter split (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Nearside Rear Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Offside Front Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Rear Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Parking brake efficiency less than 50% of the required value (1.4.2 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Exhaust system deteriorated
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both front brake discs deteriorated (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both front lower arms bushes deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Side repeater lens defective which has no effect on emitted light lamp damaged (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Coil spring corroded Both rears (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened rear subframe heavily corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement All rear subframe bushes deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive All rear subframe mounting areas corroded (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened All rear suspension arms corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement All rear suspension arms bushes deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Exhaust system deteriorated
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both front brake discs deteriorated on inside edges (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Road wheel slightly distorted inner wheel rim (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both rears (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened All rears (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement All rears (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both rear tyres treads low on outer edges (5.2.3 (e))
Front Headlamp levelling device inoperative (4.1.5 (a))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim too low and too far to the right. (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Position lamp not working sidelamp (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Parking brake efficiency less than 50% of the required value (1.4.2 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Exhaust system deteriorated
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both front brake discs deteriorated on inside edges (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Road wheel slightly distorted inner wheel rim (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both rears (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened All rears (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement All rears (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both rear tyres treads low on outer edges (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Electronic stability control warning lamp indicates a fault (7.12 (e))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
engine system service msg on display
Front Exhaust system insecure flange bolts corroded away (6.1.2 (a))
Front Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
engine system service msg on display
Central Front Lower Window damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Parking brake efficiency less than 50% of the required value (1.4.2 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Central Front Lower Window damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Rear Parking brake efficiency below requirements Parking brake (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Parking brake efficiency less than 50% of the required value (1.4.2 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Lower Suspension component pin or bush slightly worn rear wishbone nearside and offside (5.3.4 (a) (i))
advanced wear rear brake pads
Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
advanced wear rear brake pads
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
How Reliable is the Volvo XC90?
Based on 1,122,947 MOT tests across 82,375 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
AF12 UNN is a 2012 Volvo XC90 in Silver with a 2,400cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 55%.
Across all 2012 Volvo XC90 models, the average MOT pass rate is 79.2% with a typical mileage of 79,964 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Volvo XC90 fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 23,030 recorded failures. If you're considering buying AF12 UNN, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo XC90 typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 14 years old, this Volvo XC90 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of AF12 UNN?
You can check the full history of AF12 UNN by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was AF12 UNN registered?
AF12 UNN is a 2012 Volvo XC90, first registered on 26 March 2012.
Is AF12 UNN safe to buy?
The MOT history for AF12 UNN shows 20 tests with a 55% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does AF12 UNN have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on AF12 UNN. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.