MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
114,580 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Rear registration plate faded but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Rear tyre perished and worn uneven
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
exhaust back box mounting broken
Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Nearside Rear tyre perished and worn uneven
Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Offside Rear position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
exhaust back box mounting broken
Offside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Nearside Outer Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
Nearside Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Nearside Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Offside Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front constant velocity joint is insecure (2.5.C.1b)
Offside Front constant velocity joint is insecure (2.5.C.1b)
Offside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear Exhaust system not adequately supported (7.1.1)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
front discs worn .
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear coil spring incomplete (2.4.C.1a)
Offside Front Headlamp aim aimed so that it dazzles other road users (1.8.A.1a)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Rear Exhaust system not adequately supported (7.1.1)
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
front discs worn .
coil springs corroded
coil springs corroded
engin under trey 2 bolts missing
engin under trey fitted
exhaust corroded
front brake discs corroded
nail in n s rear tyres
oil leaks
rear wiper split
service light on
slight smiring to wiper
lower engine cover fitted , wear & corrosion to front brake discs , exhaust system corroded , slight cracking to suspension bushes , o/s/r tyre worn low on edges , nail in n/s/r tyre /wearing low
Nearside Rear Rear position lamp(s) excessively deteriorated so that it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.1.A.3d)
Offside Headlamp not in good working order adversely affecting beam image (1.2.4a)
Offside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
lower engine cover fitted , wear & corrosion to front brake discs , exhaust system corroded , slight cracking to suspension bushes , o/s/r tyre worn low on edges , nail in n/s/r tyre /wearing low
both rear tyre worn on edges slightly out of shape , front brake discs corroded , exhaust system corroded
Rear brake disc excessively pitted (3.5.1h)
both rear tyre worn on edges slightly out of shape , front brake discs corroded , exhaust system corroded
all brake discs corroded. †front tyres worn on edges and low all over
How Reliable is the Peugeot 307?
Based on 5,095,133 MOT tests across 320,070 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
AF53 TZJ is a 2003 Peugeot 307 in Silver with a 1,997cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 60%.
Across all 2003 Peugeot 307 models, the average MOT pass rate is 66.7% with a typical mileage of 77,386 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Peugeot 307 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 275,886 recorded failures. If you're considering buying AF53 TZJ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Peugeot 307 typically stays on UK roads for around 25 years. At 23 years old, this Peugeot 307 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of AF53 TZJ?
You can check the full history of AF53 TZJ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was AF53 TZJ registered?
AF53 TZJ is a 2003 Peugeot 307, first registered on 26 September 2003.
Is AF53 TZJ safe to buy?
The MOT history for AF53 TZJ shows 20 tests with a 60% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does AF53 TZJ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on AF53 TZJ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.