CarVerify

Free Car Check

AG51 ZBT

2002 Ford Puma

Grey Petrol 1679cc
Search another vehicle

MOT Status

Expired
Expires29 Jan 2017
Tests15 (10 pass, 5 fail)
Pass rate66.7%

Mileage

101,117 mi
Last recorded101,117 miles
Recorded on29 Jan 2016
Typical for 2002 Ford Puma65,164 mi

Significantly above average — investigate

4 checks still locked for this Ford
Stolen
Finance
Write-off
Keepers
Unlock full report — £4.99
Instant £30k guarantee
or single check £9.99

Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.

Vehicle Details

RegistrationAG51 ZBT
MakeFord
ModelPuma
Year2002
ColourGrey
Fuel typePetrol
Engine1,679cc

All premium checks include

50+ data points
Finance Check (Experian) Insurance Write-off Salvage Auction Stolen Check Previous Owners Ex-Taxi, Police, NHS Mileage Anomaly Import / Export Scrapped Check Plate Changes

MOT History

10 pass 5 fail
Pass 29 Jan 2016 101,117 miles

oil leak engine

slight binding front brakes

Pass 30 Jan 2015 98,707 miles

surface corrosion front brake discs inner faces

Fail 26 Jan 2015 98,578 miles

Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)

Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)

Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)

surface corrosion front brake discs inner faces

Pass 28 Jan 2014 96,915 miles

CORROSION TO FRONT AND REAR SUSPENSION COMPONENTS

FRONT SUSPENSION LOWER WISHBONE REAR BUSHES STARTING TO SPLIT

HANDBRAKE REQUIRES ATTENSION.NEARSIDE EFFORT LOW

Fail 28 Jan 2014 96,915 miles

CORROSION TO FRONT AND REAR SUSPENSION COMPONENTS

FRONT SUSPENSION LOWER WISHBONE REAR BUSHES STARTING TO SPLIT

HANDBRAKE REQUIRES ATTENSION.NEARSIDE EFFORT LOW

Nearside Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover missing (2.4.G.2)

Pass 24 Jan 2013 95,859 miles

Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)

Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)

Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)

Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)

Nearside Rear Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)

Oil leak

Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)

coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)

Pass 30 Jan 2012 93,586 miles

Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Rear registration plate delaminated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)

both wiper blades are split at ends but still clear screen

inner faces of front disc s arte showing signs of corrosion

o/s inner sill is showing at rear

parking brake travel is very long and only just has reserve travel

Fail 28 Jan 2012 93,586 miles

Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)

Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)

Nearside Rear wheel bearing has excessive play (2.6.2)

Offside Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)

Offside Front Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)

Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)

Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)

Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Rear registration plate delaminated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)

both wiper blades are split at ends but still clear screen

inner faces of front disc s arte showing signs of corrosion

o/s inner sill is showing at rear

parking brake travel is very long and only just has reserve travel

Pass 24 Jan 2011 89,043 miles

Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)

Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)

Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated (2.5.C.1a)

Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)

Oil leak

Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)

Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)

slight oil contamination of front lower suspension components

Pass 25 Jan 2010 86,633 miles

rear registration plate is delaminating

Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)

n/s/r tyre has cuts in outer sidewall rubbing strip but not deep enough to reach ply or cords

Pass 19 Jan 2009 80,091 miles
Fail 19 Jan 2009 80,091 miles

Front brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (3.5.1i)

Pass 29 Jan 2008 67,500 miles
Pass 2 Apr 2007 54,805 miles
Fail 2 Apr 2007 54,805 miles

Front brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (3.5.1i)

How Reliable is the Ford Puma?

Based on 713,333 MOT tests across 56,808 vehicles.

67.2%
Pass Rate
5,410
Miles/Year
29
Year Lifespan
56,808
On UK Roads

Top MOT Failure Points

Brake pipe excessively corroded 62,649
Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm 45,167
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements 24,837
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively 23,649
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded 20,373
Full Ford Puma reliability report

Don't risk it. Know before you buy.

Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.

£30k guarantee Instant results Cancel anytime

AG51 ZBT is a 2002 Ford Puma in Grey with a 1,679cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.

Across all 2002 Ford Puma models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.0% with a typical mileage of 65,164 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.

The most common reason a Ford Puma fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,649 recorded failures. If you're considering buying AG51 ZBT, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.

The Ford Puma typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 24 years old, this Ford Puma is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I check the history of AG51 ZBT?

You can check the full history of AG51 ZBT by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.

What year was AG51 ZBT registered?

AG51 ZBT is a 2002 Ford Puma, first registered on 2 January 2002.

Is AG51 ZBT safe to buy?

The MOT history for AG51 ZBT shows 15 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.

Does AG51 ZBT have outstanding finance?

Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on AG51 ZBT. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.

No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.