MOT Status
ValidMileage
111,803 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Coil spring corroded nearside rear and offside rear coil springs. (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush worn. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Wheel bearing slightly noisy (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate insecure but not likely to fall off (0.1 (a))
Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement front sub-frame rear bushes worn. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Brake pedal wearing smooth Brake pedal anti-slip worn. (1.1.2 (c))
Coil spring corroded Nearside rear and offside rear coil springs. (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Offside Rear Wheel bearing slightly noisy (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Front sub-frame rear bushes worn. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Supplementary restraint system warning lamp indicates a fault (7.1.6 (a))
Brake pedal wearing smooth Brake pedal anti-slip worn. (1.1.2 (c))
Coil spring corroded Nearside rear and offside rear coil springs. (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Offside Rear Wheel bearing slightly noisy (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Front sub-frame rear bushes worn. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Brake disc worn, but not excessively Nearside front and offside front inner brake disc (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt Nearside rear and offside rear x2
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside front and offside front windscreen wiper blades smearing
Offside Front Wheel bearing slightly noisy (5.1.3 (b) (i))
noise from steering?
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing outer wall 185/65/15 (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
noise from steering?
front brake discs showing signs of wear
front brake pads getting low
Central Stop lamp(s) not working high level (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect kicks up the opposite side and low (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front tyre cracking around tread and walls.
Nearside Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm damaged but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge and cracking around tread and walls 185/65/15 (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
front brake discs showing signs of wear
front brake pads getting low
rear tyres cracking around treads and walls.
OSF BEAM PATTERN APPEARS TO BE "LHD" IMAGE THAT HAS BEEN ADJUSTED LOW TO COMPENSATE. REC RENEWAL WITH UK SPEC RHD.
OSR BR.LGHT BULB AND OSF SIDE BULB WERE BLOWN
REAR WIPER BLADE SPLIT
offside headlight may not be rhd spec? adjusted down
rear wiper deteriorated
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
rear wiper deteriorated
INCORRECT (LHD) HEADLIGHT FITTED TO DRIVER'S SIDE CAUSING POOR IMAGE. RECOMMEND RENEWAL.
Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Vehicle's internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights
How Reliable is the Nissan Note?
Based on 2,716,974 MOT tests across 180,658 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
AO09 UXA is a 2009 Nissan Note in Blue with a 1,386cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
Across all 2009 Nissan Note models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.5% with a typical mileage of 59,175 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Nissan Note fails its MOT is coil spring broken, accounting for 38,645 recorded failures. If you're considering buying AO09 UXA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Note typically stays on UK roads for around 20 years. At 17 years old, this Nissan Note is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of AO09 UXA?
You can check the full history of AO09 UXA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was AO09 UXA registered?
AO09 UXA is a 2009 Nissan Note, first registered on 22 June 2009.
Is AO09 UXA safe to buy?
The MOT history for AO09 UXA shows 20 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does AO09 UXA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on AO09 UXA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.