MOT Status
ValidMileage
247,920 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear Exhaust mounting defective Slightly split (6.1.2 (a))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Slight crack (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Offside Rear Vehicle structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge x 2 (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Front to rear section (1.1.11 (c))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (8.2.1.2 (b))
Nearside Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Brake performance not tested DUE TO CONDITION OF FRONT SUBFRAME (1.2.1 (g))
Emissions not tested (8.2.1.2 (d))
Nearside Front Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened BY SUSPENSION ARM MOUNTING (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Exhaust emissions likely to be affected by an exhaust leak SILENCER SPLIT (8.2.1.1 (b))
Offside Rear Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced BY CHASSIS MEMBER (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure strengthening plate or fastening so insecure that structural rigidity is seriously reduced BY SPARE WHEEL FLOOR PAN (6.1.1 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Central Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced BOTTOM FLOOR PAN OF SPARE WHEEL HOLDER AND BY TOWING EYE AREA UNDERNEATH VEHICLE (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement REAR OF ARM (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake hose slightly damaged AND DUE TO BEING INSECURED TO FIXING (1.1.12 (b) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement REAR OF ARM (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Emissions not tested due to exhaust condition (8.2.1.2 (d))
Front Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Emissions not tested exhaust broken (7.3.A.1)
Offside Front Headlamp has a product on the light source so that the light output is severely reduced (1.7.5a)
Rear Exhaust system not adequately supported (7.1.1)
Rear Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Rear rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Oil leak
Front Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Oil leak
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
How Reliable is the Nissan Cube?
Based on 40,688 MOT tests across 3,773 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
AP52 WLK is a 2002 Nissan Cube in Yellow with a 1,380cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 72.7%.
Across all 2002 Nissan Cube models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.7% with a typical mileage of 109,596 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Nissan Cube fails its MOT is windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively, accounting for 416 recorded failures. If you're considering buying AP52 WLK, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Cube typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 24 years old, this Nissan Cube is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of AP52 WLK?
You can check the full history of AP52 WLK by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was AP52 WLK registered?
AP52 WLK is a 2002 Nissan Cube, first registered on 31 December 2002.
Is AP52 WLK safe to buy?
The MOT history for AP52 WLK shows 22 tests with a 72.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does AP52 WLK have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on AP52 WLK. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.