MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
182,795 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Headlamp lens slightly defective both (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive 4x4 box (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security both sides (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Front Lower Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush both sides (5.3.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Headlamp lens slightly defective both (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive 4x4 box (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security both sides (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Front Lower Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush both sides (5.3.2 (c))
Brake pedal anti-slip provision missing (1.1.2 (c))
Driver's door cannot be opened from inside the vehicle (6.2.3 (a))
Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect both (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Side repeater not working (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Inner Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Power steering component leaking poss rack (2.1.5 (a))
Front Lower Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush both sides (5.3.2 (c))
Front Lower Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush both sides (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Front Outer cv boot deteriorated
spare wheel Carrier corroded / spare wheel not fitted to it
squeak on front suspension
squeak on rear springs
Brake load sensing valve seized but ABS functioning (1.1.17 (c) (i))
Prop shaft joint excessively worn rear joint of front prop (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded both sides( on axle) (1.1.11 (c))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength both front spring hangers on rear springs (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Lower Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush both sides (5.3.2 (c))
Front pads getting low
Offside Front Outer cv boot deteriorated
spare wheel Carrier corroded / spare wheel not fitted to it
squeak on front suspension
squeak on rear springs
Front Lower Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush both sides (5.3.2 (c))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both sides {front spring hangers ] (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front passenger door cannot be opened from inside the vehicle (6.2.3 (a))
Fuel tank insecure rear strap missing (6.1.3 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength shock mounting (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Service brake effort inadequate at a wheel (1.2.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength spring hanger{rear hanger] (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Front Lower Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush both sides (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both sides {front spring hangers ] (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
spare wheel loose and cross member corroded
FRONT INNER CHASSIS RAILS CORRODING
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Rear Leaf spring anchor bracket corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.B.6d)
Nearside Rear Leaf spring deteriorated but not seriously weakened (2.4.B.1a)
Offside Rear Leaf spring anchor bracket corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.B.6d)
Offside Rear Leaf spring deteriorated but not seriously weakened (2.4.B.1a)
REAR CHASSIS RAILS CORRODING
Offside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Oil leak
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
How Reliable is the Nissan Navara?
Based on 1,323,173 MOT tests across 129,772 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
AU55 ZNO is a 2005 Nissan Navara in Green with a 2,488cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.9%.
Across all 2005 Nissan Navara models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.9% with a typical mileage of 88,875 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Nissan Navara fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 24,592 recorded failures. If you're considering buying AU55 ZNO, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Navara typically stays on UK roads for around 25 years. At 21 years old, this Nissan Navara is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of AU55 ZNO?
You can check the full history of AU55 ZNO by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was AU55 ZNO registered?
AU55 ZNO is a 2005 Nissan Navara, first registered on 29 September 2005.
Is AU55 ZNO safe to buy?
The MOT history for AU55 ZNO shows 23 tests with a 73.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does AU55 ZNO have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on AU55 ZNO. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.