MOT Status
ValidMileage
80,353 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Coil spring corroded both sides (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened both supports (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear bump stop adrift and laying inside the spring
Nearside sill corroded
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing corroded (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear bump stop missing
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded both sides (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear parking brake outer covers split/corroded
Rear shock absorber dust covers adrift both sides
corrosion around offside engine mounting
head lamps cloudy and pattern just visible at time of test
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Front Coil spring corroded both sides (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened both supports (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear bump stop adrift and laying inside the spring
Nearside sill corroded
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing corroded (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear bump stop missing
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded both sides (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear parking brake outer covers split/corroded
Rear shock absorber dust covers adrift both sides
corrosion around offside engine mounting
head lamps cloudy and pattern just visible at time of test
Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Axel corroded
Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Coil spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Coil spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened both sides (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear axel corroded
Nearside Front Inner Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure marked in yellow (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Coil spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened both sides (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear axel corroded
Nearside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Fuel cap/sealing device ineffective (6.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Integral body structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Perishing/cracking (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine sump. (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Exhaust mounting defective metal bracket broken (6.1.2 (a))
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Nearside Front road wheel distorted
Rear exhaust box outer skin corroded
rear exhaust box rusty
Nearside Front Tyre has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords sidewall (5.2.3 (d) (i))
engine sump rusty and slight oil leak
front exhaust metal bracket broken and clamp missing
possable clutch fluid leak from pipe / valve
rear exhaust box very rusty and outer skin was touching wheel , and clamp missing
slight gearbox oil leak
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords sidewall (5.2.3 (d) (i))
engine sump rusty and slight oil leak
front exhaust metal bracket broken and clamp missing
possable clutch fluid leak from pipe / valve
rear exhaust box very rusty and outer skin was touching wheel , and clamp missing
slight gearbox oil leak
Nearside Front tyre outer sidewall has a cut
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Offside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
complete exhaust system corroded
engine oil level on minimum
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both front lower arms rear bushes spitting (2.4.G.2)
exhaust silencer box rusty and clamp missing
front exhaust bracket and clamp very rusty
Front Brakes imbalanced across an axle 38% (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Nearside front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Offside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords inner sidewall splits to cords (4.1.D.1a) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front tyre , splits and cuts in sidewalls
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both front lower arms rear bushes spitting (2.4.G.2)
exhaust silencer box rusty and clamp missing
front exhaust bracket and clamp very rusty
Nearside Front tyre sidewall scuffed
Tyre worn close to the legal limit both rear tyres 3 mm tread (4.1.E.1)
rear exhaust clamp rusted away
Front Brakes imbalanced across an axle 40% (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Front tyre sidewall scuffed
Tyre worn close to the legal limit both rear tyres 3 mm tread (4.1.E.1)
rear exhaust clamp rusted away
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
AU60 YXC is a 2010 Ford Ka in Red with a 1,242cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.4%.
Across all 2010 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.5% with a typical mileage of 49,974 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying AU60 YXC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 16 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of AU60 YXC?
You can check the full history of AU60 YXC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was AU60 YXC registered?
AU60 YXC is a 2010 Ford Ka, first registered on 28 September 2010.
Is AU60 YXC safe to buy?
The MOT history for AU60 YXC shows 19 tests with a 68.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does AU60 YXC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on AU60 YXC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.