MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
60,473 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake master cylinder/servo mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (1.1.21 (e) (i))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Suspension arm ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt O/S/F Upper suspension arm (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule All flexible brake hoses (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Various (1.1.11 (c))
Exhaust system leaking slightly
Nearside Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
Nearside Rear Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b))
Offside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Tyre slightly damaged O/S/F inner side wall (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Chassis (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Vehicle structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security Chassis (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both brake pipes to front flexis getting corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Front Service brake binding but not excessively both front brakes binding. (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both brake pipes on rear axle getting corroded (replace soon) (1.1.11 (c))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Various pipes coated / Suspected corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Vehicle underside has additional underbody protection applied including to rigid brake pipes and suspension components
Brake performance unable to be tested Burst pipe (1.2.1 (g))
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Bulb incorrectly fitted (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Brake pipe leaking on a hydraulic braking system Front section of front to rear (1.1.11 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Various pipes coated / Suspected corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Vehicle underside has additional underbody protection applied including to rigid brake pipes and suspension components
Lower Under trays fitted obscuring components
Lower Underside Undersealed
Nearside Front Inner Play in steering rack inner joint(s) Slight wear in rack end ()
Under trays fitted obscuring components
Underside heavily undersealed
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge heavily worn at edges (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge heavily worn at edges (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive front diff seals (8.4.1 (a) (i))
undercarrage including various suspension components corroded
Driver's seat with a defective structure (6.2.5 (a) (i))
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases centre flange (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge heavily worn at edges (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge heavily worn at edges (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive front diff seals (8.4.1 (a) (i))
undercarrage including various suspension components corroded
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material front sections of both front to rear brake pipes slightly corroded at lower ends (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive slight from front differential (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material front sections of both front to rear brake pipes slightly corroded at lower ends (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Oil leak, but not excessive slight from front differential (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive front differential (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Spare tyre defective below 1.6 mm ()
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive front differential (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Spare tyre defective below 1.6 mm ()
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Nearside Rear Leaf spring fractured (2.4.B.1a)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin inner pads (3.5.1g)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
How Reliable is the Ford Ranger?
Based on 1,687,380 MOT tests across 189,558 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
AU62 YZN is a 2012 Ford Ranger in Blue with a 3,198cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 58.8%.
Across all 2012 Ford Ranger models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.7% with a typical mileage of 79,392 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Ranger fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 41,033 recorded failures. If you're considering buying AU62 YZN, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ranger typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 14 years old, this Ford Ranger is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of AU62 YZN?
You can check the full history of AU62 YZN by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was AU62 YZN registered?
AU62 YZN is a 2012 Ford Ranger, first registered on 12 September 2012.
Is AU62 YZN safe to buy?
The MOT history for AU62 YZN shows 17 tests with a 58.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does AU62 YZN have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on AU62 YZN. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.