MOT Status
ValidMileage
63,529 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Central Front Lower Exhaust mounting defective bracket broken off/corroded (6.1.2 (a))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread minor damage + dull (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front pad wear sensor broken (pads ok)
Nearside Rear Upper Exhaust mounting defective rubber mounting perished/split (6.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Stop lamp(s) lens defective which has no effect on emitted light cracked/minor damage (4.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened spring hangers both sides (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect both h/lamp lenses opaque affecting beam pattern (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Position lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (4.2.3 (c))
Offside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour no longer amber/white light to rear (4.4.3 (a))
Central Front Lower Exhaust mounting defective bracket broken off/corroded (6.1.2 (a))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread minor damage + dull (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front pad wear sensor broken (pads ok)
Nearside Rear Upper Exhaust mounting defective rubber mounting perished/split (6.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Position lamp slightly affected by the operation of another lamp (4.2.3 (c))
Offside Rear Stop lamp(s) lens defective which has no effect on emitted light cracked/minor damage (4.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened spring hangers both sides (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Central Front Exhaust mounting defective mounting broken/fractured/corroded (6.1.2 (a))
Central Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front pad sensor wire broken
Offside Rear Rear fog lamp lens defective which has no effect on emitted light lens cracked (4.5.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened H frame/axle both sides near spring hanger (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Central Front Exhaust mounting defective mounting broken/fractured/corroded (6.1.2 (a))
Central Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect lenses milky/opaque both sides affecting beam pattern (polished) (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Front pad sensor wire broken
Offside Rear Rear fog lamp lens defective which has no effect on emitted light lens cracked (4.5.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened H frame/axle both sides near spring hanger (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect both sides due to "milky" lenses + os too low (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases Flexible front pipe collapsed (6.1.2 (a))
Exhaust flexi deteriorated
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing Corroded (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Coil spring corroded Both rears and Nearside front (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Exhaust flexi deteriorated
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing Corroded (5.3.2 (b))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Both rear shock absorber top bush slightly worn and perished
Exhaust corroded
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel
Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Both (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement arm rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (2.7.4)
Offside Front Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (2.7.4)
all coil springs slightly corroded
n/s/f tyre deteriorated slightly and worn on inner and outer edges and down to 3.0mm tread depth
o/s/f anti roll bar drop link lower boot slightly deteriorated
o/s/f tyre slightly deteriorated and worn on inner and outer edges and down to 3.0mm tread depth
o/s/r seat missing so unable to check seat belt buckle seat belt is ok though
Rear Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush nearside & offside (2.7.4)
exhaust hangers are corroded but system is still adequately supported
Nearside Front Brake hose twisted (3.6.B.4c)
Rear Upper Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush nearside & offside (2.7.4)
exhaust hangers are corroded but system is still adequately supported
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Fiat Qubo?
Based on 70,552 MOT tests across 5,289 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
BD10 MKF is a 2010 Fiat Qubo in Blue with a 1,360cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 61.9%.
Across all 2010 Fiat Qubo models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.7% with a typical mileage of 52,925 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Fiat Qubo fails its MOT is coil spring broken, accounting for 1,304 recorded failures. If you're considering buying BD10 MKF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Fiat Qubo typically stays on UK roads for around 18 years. At 16 years old, this Fiat Qubo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of BD10 MKF?
You can check the full history of BD10 MKF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was BD10 MKF registered?
BD10 MKF is a 2010 Fiat Qubo, first registered on 6 August 2010.
Is BD10 MKF safe to buy?
The MOT history for BD10 MKF shows 21 tests with a 61.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does BD10 MKF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on BD10 MKF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.