MOT Status
ValidMileage
100,543 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Rear Coil spring corroded both rear springs corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear rear axel corroded
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Coil spring corroded both rear springs (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear rear axle corroded
Nearside Front Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn bottom arm rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge tyre 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Coil spring corroded both rear springs (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear rear axle corroded
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened AXLE (5.3.3 (b) (i))
exhaust corroded
Boot can only be opened via key fob
Exhaust system/clamps/supports deteriorated
Front Coil spring corroded nearside and offside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated nearside and offside perished/cracking (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened nearside and offside (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement arm back bushes on nearside and offside (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Play in steering rack inner joint(s) s
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened sub frame and support bars corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule s)(unions/connections (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded nearside and offside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear axle corroded, recommend monitoring
Offside Front Position lamp not working also doubles up as day time running lamp (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Outer Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Boot can only be opened via key fob
Exhaust system/clamps/supports deteriorated
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened s)(inner surface (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Coil spring corroded nearside and offside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated nearside and offside perished/cracking (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened nearside and offside (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement arm back bushes on nearside and offside (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Play in steering rack inner joint(s) s
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened sub frame and support bars corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front brake assembly noisy/rough when wheels are rotated by hand
Nearside Front Valve stem slightly misaligned (5.2.3 (j))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule s)(unions/connections (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded nearside and offside (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear axle corroded, recommend monitoring
Rear exhaust backbox in poor condition
Nearside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Rear exhaust backbox in poor condition
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 3mm tread depth also cracked/perished (5.2.3 (e))
Rear rear exhaust back box and clamp in poor condition
Rear exhaust backbox in poor condition
Offside Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Rear exhaust backbox in poor condition
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front tyre low on edge
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper blade insecure (8.2.2)
Offside Rear Mechanical brake component has restricted free movement (3.5.1k)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front tyre low on edge
Nearside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement in the upper support bearing assembly (2.5.B.1b)
front exhaust bracket slightly corroded
offside front upper strut support bearing slightly stiff on side to side movement
rear back box outer skin corroded
rear exhaust bracket corroded but secure time of test
exhaust back box corroded
How Reliable is the Fiat 500?
Based on 3,854,072 MOT tests across 331,691 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
BD59 SVW is a 2009 Fiat 500 in White with a 1,242cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
Across all 2009 Fiat 500 models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.3% with a typical mileage of 55,298 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Fiat 500 fails its MOT is shock absorber has an excessively worn bush, accounting for 26,240 recorded failures. If you're considering buying BD59 SVW, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Fiat 500 typically stays on UK roads for around 18 years. At 17 years old, this Fiat 500 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of BD59 SVW?
You can check the full history of BD59 SVW by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was BD59 SVW registered?
BD59 SVW is a 2009 Fiat 500, first registered on 16 December 2009.
Is BD59 SVW safe to buy?
The MOT history for BD59 SVW shows 20 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does BD59 SVW have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on BD59 SVW. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.