MOT Status
ValidMileage
63,861 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrier (4.13 (a) (i))
Coil spring corroded n/s/r o/s/r o/s/f (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement front bush splitting - - also arm corroded (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
earth terminal insecure on battery
front subframe and rear axle corroded
osf shock corroded
Battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrier (4.13 (a) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened both front shockers (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both front tyres worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Rear Coil spring corroded both rear (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both heavily cracked on inside 2019 dot code (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
both front indicators pale
exhaust heat shield loose
front subframe corroded
rear axle corroded
washer fluid cap missing
Front Headlamp aim too low both (4.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn front bush debonding (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrier (4.13 (a) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened both front shockers (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both front tyres worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Nearside Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Rear Coil spring corroded both rear (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both heavily cracked on inside 2019 dot code (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
both front indicators pale
exhaust heat shield loose
front subframe corroded
rear axle corroded
rear wiper split
washer fluid cap missing
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension component ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
rear wheel bearings , should be replaced within 30 days , roughness evident when road wheels are rotated .
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge worn edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn front bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn front bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Wheel bearing slightly noisy recommend wheel bearing replacement asap. (5.1.3 (b) (i))
clutch worn lacking in power , recommend replaceing asap.
coil springs at various points showing corrosion
front suspension arms , bushes showing deterioration
brake pads to be checked
exhaust link pipes showing corrosion
suspension arms bushes worn
front tyres showing uneven wear on outer edges , wheel tracking to be checked .
suspension coil springs at various points showing corrosion
Nearside Front Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Driver's door hinge insecure retaining nut , retentioned from a post to door (6.2.3 (c) (ii))
Offside Front Lower Seat belt anchorage loose has been retentioned (7.1.1 (b))
front tyres showing uneven wear on outer edges , wheel tracking to be checked .
suspension coil springs at various points showing corrosion
at the base of road wheel valves , slight deterioration evident
brakes linings to be inspected
near side front tyre showing slight uneven wear , due to possible wheel tracking .
rear wiper rubber split
Nearside Front Seat belt insecurely fixed to the vehicles structure lower anchorage point (5.2.1a)
Nearside Front Track rod end loose track rod end lock nut , not tight (2.2.B.1d)
Side repeater not working (1.4.A.2c)
at the base of road wheel valves , slight deterioration evident
brakes linings to be inspected
near side front tyre showing slight uneven wear , due to possible wheel tracking .
rear wiper rubber split
Nearside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
How Reliable is the Nissan Micra?
Based on 10,566,512 MOT tests across 827,110 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
BD61 ZGV is a 2011 Nissan Micra in Grey with a 1,198cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 76.5%.
Across all 2011 Nissan Micra models, the average MOT pass rate is 77.2% with a typical mileage of 41,330 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Nissan Micra fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 413,594 recorded failures. If you're considering buying BD61 ZGV, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Micra typically stays on UK roads for around 37 years. At 15 years old, this Nissan Micra is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of BD61 ZGV?
You can check the full history of BD61 ZGV by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was BD61 ZGV registered?
BD61 ZGV is a 2011 Nissan Micra, first registered on 30 November 2011.
Is BD61 ZGV safe to buy?
The MOT history for BD61 ZGV shows 17 tests with a 76.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does BD61 ZGV have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on BD61 ZGV. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.