MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
131,895 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Rear handbrake brake effort low
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover excessively damaged or deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage insecurely attached broken (5.3.3 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear handbrake brake effort low
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Weak Beam Pattern (4.1.4 (b))
Offside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Weak Beam Pattern (4.1.4 (b))
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.2.2 (g))
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Weak Beam Pattern (4.1.4 (b))
Offside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Weak Beam Pattern (4.1.4 (b))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear caliper handbrake lever pulled forward
eml on
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage insecure (2.4.G.1)
Front both wipers poor
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit low at 2mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear caliper handbrake lever pulled forward
eml on
EML ON
NSF AND OSF TYRES WORN VERY LOW ON INNER EDGES
Nearside Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
OSR TYRE WORN VERY LOW ON INNER EDGE
Offside Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
Offside Rear Nail in tyre ()
Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Offside Headlamp excessively deteriorated so that the light output is severely reduced (1.7.5a)
Windscreen has damage to the swept area in excess of a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
EML ON
NSF AND OSF TYRES WORN VERY LOW ON INNER EDGES
Nearside Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
OSR TYRE WORN VERY LOW ON INNER EDGE
Offside Rear Nail in tyre ()
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
oil leak
Battery insecure (1.9.1)
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Outer Front constant velocity joint is insecure (2.5.C.1b)
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Front Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit 195/60r15 (4.1.E.1)
oil leak
both rear tyres are cracked and perished
engine light is on
front brake discs are in poor condition
front wiper blades are in poor condition
n/s and the o/s headlamp images are very poor and faint
n/s and the o/s headlamp lenses are badly missted over
oil leak
screw in the o/s rear tyre
Nearside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover excessively damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Offside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
both rear tyres are cracked and perished
engine light is on
front brake discs are in poor condition
front wiper blades are in poor condition
n/s and the o/s headlamp images are very poor and faint
n/s and the o/s headlamp lenses are badly missted over
oil leak
screw in the o/s rear tyre
Engine Management light on
Nail in offside rear tyre
Offside Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Engine Management light on
Nail in offside rear tyre
Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a)
Front tyres wearing on inside edges possible tracking
Offside front tyre bald on inside edge
Nearside Headlamp aim not tested (1.8.A.1c)
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Both rear tyres getting low outer edges
How Reliable is the Mitsubishi Carisma?
Based on 391,885 MOT tests across 40,862 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
BG04 KXM is a 2004 Mitsubishi Carisma in Silver with a 1,870cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 63.6%.
Across all 2004 Mitsubishi Carisma models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.1% with a typical mileage of 75,884 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mitsubishi Carisma fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 27,459 recorded failures. If you're considering buying BG04 KXM, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mitsubishi Carisma typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 22 years old, this Mitsubishi Carisma is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of BG04 KXM?
You can check the full history of BG04 KXM by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was BG04 KXM registered?
BG04 KXM is a 2004 Mitsubishi Carisma, first registered on 16 April 2004.
Is BG04 KXM safe to buy?
The MOT history for BG04 KXM shows 22 tests with a 63.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does BG04 KXM have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on BG04 KXM. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.