MOT Status
ValidMileage
163,826 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Tyre has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords All four (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Offside Front Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (1.6 (b))
Brake load sensing valve seized but ABS functioning (1.1.17 (c) (i))
Stop lamp(s) with a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Emissions unable to be completed (8.2.2.2 (e))
Exhaust emissions likely to be affected by an exhaust leak (8.2.2.1 (b))
Service brake efficiency below requirements (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pipe at imminent risk of failure or fracture front to rear (1.1.11 (a)) DANGEROUS
Battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrier (4.13 (a) (i))
Air conditioning drive belt missing
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear position lamp(s) damaged, but still visible from a reasonable distance repair tape used
Os/f/ sidelight and O/s/f Main beam started working during test
Front Oil leak ()
Nearside Rear Rear position lamp(s) damaged, but still visible from a reasonable distance repair tape used (1.1.A.3d)
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
air con drive belt missing
Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Front Anti-roll bar linkage rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides perished (2.4.G.2)
Front Inner Brake pad(s) wearing thin pads very low *** STRONG ADVISE *** (3.5.1g)
Front Oil leak ()
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Nearside Front tyre bald outer edge
Nearside Rear Rear position lamp(s) damaged, but still visible from a reasonable distance repair tape used (1.1.A.3d)
Offside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
air con drive belt missing
Brake hydraulic reservoir fluid close to minimum level (3.6.G.1b)
Corrosion to nearside and offside chassis rails.
Damage to nearside tail lamp lens that has repair tape applied to it.
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Drop link figure 8 bushes perishing. (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin Pads around 85 to 90% worn. (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear Leaf spring deteriorated but not seriously weakened Leaf spring corroded. (2.4.B.1a)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Drop link figure 8 bushes perishing. (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin Pads around 85 to 90% worn. (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Rear Leaf spring deteriorated but not seriously weakened Leaf spring corroded. (2.4.B.1a)
Nearside front tyre is balding on outer edge
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Ford Ranger?
Based on 1,687,380 MOT tests across 189,558 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
BG09 MXN is a 2009 Ford Ranger in Black with a 2,500cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 77.8%.
Across all 2009 Ford Ranger models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.4% with a typical mileage of 86,225 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Ranger fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 41,033 recorded failures. If you're considering buying BG09 MXN, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ranger typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 17 years old, this Ford Ranger is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of BG09 MXN?
You can check the full history of BG09 MXN by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was BG09 MXN registered?
BG09 MXN is a 2009 Ford Ranger, first registered on 11 June 2009.
Is BG09 MXN safe to buy?
The MOT history for BG09 MXN shows 18 tests with a 77.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does BG09 MXN have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on BG09 MXN. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.