MOT Status
ValidMileage
42,962 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively both front disc have slight fluctuation (1.2.1 (e))
Nearside Front Inner Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both inner bushes starting to separate/crack (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively both front disc slight fluctuation (1.2.1 (e))
Nearside Front Inner Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement left hand bush starting to split / separate (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Inner Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn right hand bush separated from central pin (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively both front disc slight fluctuation (1.2.1 (e))
Nearside Front Inner Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement left hand bush starting to split / separate (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear **wiper split **
Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively both front disc have slight fluctuation (1.2.1 (e))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Inner Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement right hand bonded bush perished and cracked (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Battery insecure and likely to cause a short circuit (4.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords cut in tread to cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Offside Rear Inner Tyre has a lump, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure lump on inner sidewall (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Outer Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure excessively perished/cracked showing cords (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively both front disc have slight fluctuation (1.2.1 (e))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Inner Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement right hand bonded bush perished and cracked (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front brake discs worn / lipped (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing age cracks to outer sidewall (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights
Battery insecure and likely to cause a short circuit (4.13 (a) (ii))
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.1.2 (h))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front brake discs worn / lipped (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing age cracks to outer sidewall (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights
Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively lipped slightly (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively lipped slightly (1.1.14 (a) (i))
How Reliable is the Nissan Note?
Based on 2,716,974 MOT tests across 180,658 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
BG17 EKT is a 2017 Nissan Note in Red with a 1,198cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 10 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70%.
Across all 2017 Nissan Note models, the average MOT pass rate is 87.8% with a typical mileage of 30,338 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Nissan Note fails its MOT is coil spring broken, accounting for 38,645 recorded failures. If you're considering buying BG17 EKT, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Note typically stays on UK roads for around 20 years. At 9 years old, this Nissan Note is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of BG17 EKT?
You can check the full history of BG17 EKT by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was BG17 EKT registered?
BG17 EKT is a 2017 Nissan Note, first registered on 13 March 2017.
Is BG17 EKT safe to buy?
The MOT history for BG17 EKT shows 10 tests with a 70% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does BG17 EKT have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on BG17 EKT. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.