MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
81,544 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Service brake lagging in operation (1.2.1 (d))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength outer sill /rear beam mounting (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt insecure (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength outer sill /rear beam mounting (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Brakes imbalanced across an axle by more than 50% 62% (1.2.1 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively both worn lipped (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Side repeater insecure (4.4.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Power steering component has slight seepage from a component rack (2.1.5 (a))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both rear axel beam bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both axel beam mounting (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced both outer sill-floor (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively both (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Power steering component has slight seepage from a component rack (2.1.5 (a))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm attachment bracket/mounting corroded but its strength is not seriously reduced both axel beam mountings (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both axel beam mountings (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced both outer sill and sill -floor (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Emissions unable to be completed (8.2.1.2 (d))
Exhaust emissions likely to be affected by an exhaust leak (8.2.2.1 (b))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively both (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Power steering component has slight seepage from a component rack (2.1.5 (a))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm attachment bracket/mounting corroded but its strength is not seriously reduced both axel beam mountings (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both axel beam mountings (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced both outer sill and sill -floor (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. PERFORMANCE LOW (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Outer Vehicle structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security sills corroded (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Nearside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt split (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Offside Front Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt insecure (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Nearside Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. PERFORMANCE LOW (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Outer Vehicle structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security sills corroded (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement TRAILING ARM BUSH, STARTING TO SPLIT. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement TRAILING ARM BUSH, STARTING TO SPLIT. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. PERFORMANCE LOW (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
CORROSION ON N/S AND O/S REAR OUTER SILLS
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
REAR EXHAUST HEATSHIELD INSECURE.
Nearside Front Outer Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
REAR EXHAUST HEATSHIELD INSECURE.
NSF STEERING RACK GAITER SLIGHTLY DAMP.
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Supplementary restraint system warning lamp indicates a fault (7.1.6 (a))
Windscreen washer not working (3.5 (a))
NSF STEERING RACK GAITER SLIGHTLY DAMP.
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front BRAKE SLIGHT DRAG
Offside Rear Road wheel with a slightly distorted bead rim ON INNER RIM (4.2.A.1a)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit N/S AND O/S ON INNER EDGES (WORN TO MINIMUM) (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front brake slight drag
Offside Rear Road wheel with a slightly distorted bead rim on inner rim (4.2.A.1a)
Handbrake travel high
Rear exhaust section corroded
Slight dampness around n/s steering rack gaiter
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Offside Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
front brake pads wearing low
rear exhaust section corroded / repaired
slight dampness around n/s of steering rack
both rear tyres slightly miss-shaped
n/s/r tyre wearing low (2/3mm)
steering rack damp around n/s gaitor area
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
both rear tyres slightly miss-shaped
n/s/r tyre wearing low (2/3mm)
steering rack damp around n/s gaitor area
Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
How Reliable is the MG Zr?
Based on 651,705 MOT tests across 53,026 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
BG54 KNE is a 2004 MG Zr in Red with a 1,396cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 25 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 72%.
Across all 2004 MG Zr models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.6% with a typical mileage of 54,500 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a MG Zr fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 31,258 recorded failures. If you're considering buying BG54 KNE, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The MG Zr typically stays on UK roads for around 25 years. At 22 years old, this MG Zr is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of BG54 KNE?
You can check the full history of BG54 KNE by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was BG54 KNE registered?
BG54 KNE is a 2004 MG Zr, first registered on 18 October 2004.
Is BG54 KNE safe to buy?
The MOT history for BG54 KNE shows 25 tests with a 72% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does BG54 KNE have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on BG54 KNE. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.