MOT Status
ValidMileage
177,866 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement trailing arm (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement trailing arm (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Lower Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear o/s/r tyre has a nail in tread
Central Front Oil leak, but not excessive engine oil leak but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement n/s/f lower suspension arm rear bush worn but does not move excessively (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front n/s/f tyre worn low inner edge and worn close to legal limit 2mm
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement o/s/f lower suspension arm rear bush worn but does not move excessively (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Upper Coil spring corroded o/s/f coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front o/s/f tyre worn close to legal limit 2mm
Offside Rear fuel filler device damaged but no signs leakage
Central Front Oil leak, but not excessive engine oil leak but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Inner Bumper damaged and likely to cause injury when grazed or contacted bumper damaged small sharp edges (6.1.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement n/s/f lower suspension arm rear bush worn but does not move excessively (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front n/s/f tyre worn low inner edge and worn close to legal limit 2mm
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement o/s/f lower suspension arm rear bush worn but does not move excessively (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Upper Coil spring corroded o/s/f coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front o/s/f tyre worn close to legal limit 2mm
Offside Rear fuel filler device damaged but no signs leakage
Offside Rear o/s/r tyre has a nail in tread
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 215/55R16 (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
How Reliable is the Ford C-max?
Based on 1,804,249 MOT tests across 138,182 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
BG62 TSY is a 2012 Ford C-max in Brown with a 1,560cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.8%.
Across all 2012 Ford C-max models, the average MOT pass rate is 80.4% with a typical mileage of 59,872 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford C-max fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 25,824 recorded failures. If you're considering buying BG62 TSY, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford C-max typically stays on UK roads for around 20 years. At 14 years old, this Ford C-max is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of BG62 TSY?
You can check the full history of BG62 TSY by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was BG62 TSY registered?
BG62 TSY is a 2012 Ford C-max, first registered on 27 November 2012.
Is BG62 TSY safe to buy?
The MOT history for BG62 TSY shows 16 tests with a 68.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does BG62 TSY have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on BG62 TSY. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.