MOT Status
ValidMileage
122,642 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Exhaust back box corroded and centre heat shield insecure
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Heavily worn/corroded on inner faces (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Heavily age cracking on edges (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Heavily age cracking on edges (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Offside and nearside trailing arm, front bushes deteriorated/de-bonding. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive General age related corrosion to chassis rails, floor, inner wheel arches/turret tops and suspension components. (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Chips (3.2 (a) (i))
Horn not working (7.7 (a))
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively Split (3.4 (b) (ii))
Exhaust back box corroded and centre heat shield insecure
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Heavily worn/corroded on inner faces (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Heavily age cracking on edges (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Heavily age cracking on edges (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Offside and nearside trailing arm, front bushes deteriorated/de-bonding. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive General age related corrosion to chassis rails, floor, inner wheel arches/turret tops and suspension components. (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Chips (3.2 (a) (i))
Exhaust back box corroded
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Heavily worn/corroded on inner faces (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Age cracking (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Age cracking (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Offside and nearside trailing arm, front bushes deteriorated/de-bonding. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive General age related corrosion to chassis rails, floor, inner wheel arches/turret tops and suspension components. (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Chips (3.2 (a) (i))
Exhaust back box corroding
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Worn on inner faces (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Windscreen wiper blade defective Split. (3.4 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Offside and nearside trailing arm, front bushes deteriorated/de-bonding. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Chips (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Brake hose excessively twisted (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Outer Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt ()
Nearside Front Inner Brake disc significantly and obviously worn inside face (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn trailing arm bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Inner Brake disc significantly and obviously worn inside face (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Ford Grand C-max?
Based on 431,851 MOT tests across 39,255 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
BG62 XDF is a 2012 Ford Grand C-max in Black with a 1,560cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 14 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 78.6%.
Across all 2012 Ford Grand C-max models, the average MOT pass rate is 77.1% with a typical mileage of 69,209 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Grand C-max fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 2,835 recorded failures. If you're considering buying BG62 XDF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Grand C-max typically stays on UK roads for around 15 years. At 14 years old, this Ford Grand C-max is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of BG62 XDF?
You can check the full history of BG62 XDF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was BG62 XDF registered?
BG62 XDF is a 2012 Ford Grand C-max, first registered on 31 December 2012.
Is BG62 XDF safe to buy?
The MOT history for BG62 XDF shows 14 tests with a 78.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does BG62 XDF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on BG62 XDF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.