MOT Status
ValidMileage
104,116 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Weak/poor dipped beam image on BOTH headlamps (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Insecure (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Headlamp has a product on the light source but not seriously reducing light output Weak/Poor dipped beam image on BOTH headlamps (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Badly cracking in tread (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Worn low on inner & outer tread (3.0mm) (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Worn very low on inner tread (2.0mm) & low on outer tread (3.0mm) (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Worn to 3.0mm & cracking in tread (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Worn to 2.0mm & cracking in tread (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Inner sidewall (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Earth/low battery voltage supply causing Sidelights & indicators to flash simultaneously
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Worn to 3.0mm & cracking in tread (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Worn to 2.0mm & cracking in tread (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear most (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear most (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced vehicle will possibly fail on corrosion nxt year as body and rear subframee heavily corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Rear Fuel system component leaking filler neck corroded away pipe fell in half causing leak (6.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength retainer fractured broke in half upper (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength spring retainer fractured broken likely to move and may come into contact with brake pipe (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Fuel tank leaking filler neck has dampness heavily corroded require replacement ASAP (6.1.3 (b) (i))
Rear Fuel hose deteriorated (6.1.3 (c) (ii))
n s f alloy rim kinked in too places and tyre was slightly deflated
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin front brake pads getting low (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
all fuel filler pipes corroded
o/s and n/s rear brake pipes corroded
Offside Rear Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
all fuel filler pipes corroded
o/s and n/s rear brake pipes corroded
Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Lexus Ct?
Based on 304,916 MOT tests across 32,361 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
BJ11 RCX is a 2011 Lexus Ct in Black with a 1,798cc other engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70.6%.
Across all 2011 Lexus Ct models, the average MOT pass rate is 84.1% with a typical mileage of 69,690 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Lexus Ct fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 1,016 recorded failures. If you're considering buying BJ11 RCX, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Lexus Ct typically stays on UK roads for around 15 years. At 15 years old, this Lexus Ct is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of BJ11 RCX?
You can check the full history of BJ11 RCX by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was BJ11 RCX registered?
BJ11 RCX is a 2011 Lexus Ct, first registered on 29 March 2011.
Is BJ11 RCX safe to buy?
The MOT history for BJ11 RCX shows 17 tests with a 70.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does BJ11 RCX have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on BJ11 RCX. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.