MOT Status
ValidMileage
167,159 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Offside and nearside trailing arm, front bushes heavily deteriorated/de-bonding. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour Amber coloured coating deteriorated (4.4.3 (a))
Nearside Side repeater not working (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour Amber coloured coating deteriorated (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage insecure and impairing directional stability Link broken (5.3.3 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Exhaust, centre heat shield insecure. ADVISE REPAIR/REPLACEMENT SOON
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge ON LIMIT. Very heavily worn on inner edge/Nearly through to cords. ADVISE REPLACEMENT (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Heavily worn on inner edge. ADVISE REPLACEMENT SOON. (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Offside and nearside trailing arm, front bushes heavily deteriorated/de-bonding. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Windscreen wiper blade defective both sides (3.4 (b) (i))
hand brake lever travel
Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Windscreen wiper blade defective both sides (3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
hand brake lever travel
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened wearing (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin 70% worn (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake lining(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge BOTH FRONT AND REAR WORN,CUTS 215/55/16 (5.2.3 (e))
Under trays are damaged and insecure
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Pitted (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Cracking (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both front arms bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed inner edge (215/55/16) (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit Both 3 mm approx (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Wiper blade damaged
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
front and rear discs scored and lipped,recommend changing
How Reliable is the Ford C-max?
Based on 1,804,249 MOT tests across 138,182 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
BL61 AXG is a 2012 Ford C-max in Blue with a 1,596cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70.6%.
Across all 2012 Ford C-max models, the average MOT pass rate is 80.4% with a typical mileage of 59,872 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford C-max fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 25,824 recorded failures. If you're considering buying BL61 AXG, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford C-max typically stays on UK roads for around 20 years. At 14 years old, this Ford C-max is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of BL61 AXG?
You can check the full history of BL61 AXG by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was BL61 AXG registered?
BL61 AXG is a 2012 Ford C-max, first registered on 24 February 2012.
Is BL61 AXG safe to buy?
The MOT history for BL61 AXG shows 17 tests with a 70.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does BL61 AXG have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on BL61 AXG. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.