MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
67,327 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Coil spring corroded ALL (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Lower Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output BOTH SIDES FRONT HEADLIGHTS SLIGHTLY DETERIORATED (4.1.4 (b))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Coil spring corroded ALL (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Lower Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output BOTH SIDES FRONT HEADLIGHTS SLIGHTLY DETERIORATED (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Central Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive OFF SIDE OUTER SILL (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Power steering ram has slight seepage from a joint RACK (2.1.5 (a))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge BOTH REAR TYRES WEARING ON EDGES (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Central Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive OFF SIDE OUTER SILL (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Power steering ram has slight seepage from a joint RACK (2.1.5 (a))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge BOTH FRONT WEARING ON EDGES (5.2.3 (e))
Coil spring corroded BOTH FRONT (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Lower Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view SCEEN CRACKED (3.2 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing PERISHING (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive ENGINE & GEAR BOX (8.4.1 (a) (i))
BATTERY INSECURE BUT WILL NOT MOVE OUT OF BATTERY BOX
WINDSCREEN HAS A CRACK BELOW WIPER BLADES MAY NEED ATTENTION SOON
coil spring corroded BOTH FRONT (2.4.C.1b)
rear parking (secondary) brake imbalance requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.6b)
ENGINE HAS OIL LEAK
Nearside Rear TYRESSLIGHTLY PERISHED
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
WINDSCREEN HAS A CRACK UNDER BEEN LOW WIPER BLADES
Brake pad(s) wearing thin BOTH FRONT 75 % WORN (3.5.1g)
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases FRONT FLEXI PIPE (7.1.2)
OIL LEAK
Tyre worn close to the legal limit BOTH FRONT ON 2 MM (4.1.E.1)
WINDSCEEN HASD A CRACK LOWER EDGE
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Oil leak
How Reliable is the Rover 25?
Based on 1,784,341 MOT tests across 157,261 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
BN54 RZP is a 2004 Rover 25 in Black with a 1,396cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 87.5%.
Across all 2004 Rover 25 models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.4% with a typical mileage of 44,756 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Rover 25 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 69,670 recorded failures. If you're considering buying BN54 RZP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Rover 25 typically stays on UK roads for around 26 years. At 22 years old, this Rover 25 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of BN54 RZP?
You can check the full history of BN54 RZP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was BN54 RZP registered?
BN54 RZP is a 2004 Rover 25, first registered on 25 September 2004.
Is BN54 RZP safe to buy?
The MOT history for BN54 RZP shows 16 tests with a 87.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does BN54 RZP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on BN54 RZP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.