MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
143,499 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
All 4 shock mounts have play
Centre gearbox stabilizer mounting point to chassis badly damaged
Front reg deteriorated
Fuel filter corroded
Fuel pipes corroded in places
N/S tail light lense cracked
N/S/F lower arm rear bush separating
N/S/R tyre cracking and aboiut 3mm approx
O/S/F lower arm rear bush separated
Rear Chassis corroded
Various brake pipes starting to corrode in places
Nearside Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
Offside Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
All 4 shock mounts have play
Centre gearbox stabilizer mounting point to chassis badly damaged
Front reg deteriorated
Fuel filter corroded
Fuel pipes corroded in places
Horn not working (1.6.2a)
N/S tail light lense cracked
N/S/F lower arm rear bush separating
N/S/R tyre cracking and aboiut 3mm approx
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
O/S/F lower arm rear bush separated
Offside Headlamp aim too high and too far to the right. (1.8)
Rear Chassis corroded
Various brake pipes starting to corrode in places
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
both rear top shock mount bushes worn
both rear trailing arm bushes worn
brake pipes corroded
front brake discs in poor condition
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
brake hose ferrals corroded
brake pipes corroded
front brake discs in poor condition
front brake hoses perished
play in offside rear top shock mount
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Inner Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Nearside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Rear fog lamp emits a light other than red (1.3.2e)
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
both rear metal brake pipe corroded on limit
n/s/f wishbone rear bush split out
o/s/f wishbone rear bush starting to split
only one of two rear seat catches securing seat back
rear inner sills starting to corrode
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
both rear metal brake pipe corroded on limit
n/s/f wishbone rear bush split out
o/s/f wishbone rear bush starting to split
o/s/r tyre close to limit
only one of two rear seat catches securing seat back
rear inner sills starting to corrode
Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
How Reliable is the Ford Puma?
Based on 713,333 MOT tests across 56,808 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
BV02 MSU is a 2002 Ford Puma in Grey with a 1,679cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 12 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2002 Ford Puma models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.0% with a typical mileage of 65,164 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Puma fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,649 recorded failures. If you're considering buying BV02 MSU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Puma typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 24 years old, this Ford Puma is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of BV02 MSU?
You can check the full history of BV02 MSU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was BV02 MSU registered?
BV02 MSU is a 2002 Ford Puma, first registered on 1 March 2002.
Is BV02 MSU safe to buy?
The MOT history for BV02 MSU shows 12 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does BV02 MSU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on BV02 MSU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.