MOT Status
ValidMileage
38,765 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b))
Rear Fog light slightly discoloured
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing All tyres (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Bonnet cannot be secured in the closed position (3.1 (b) (i))
Horn not working (7.7 (a))
Offside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b))
Rear Fog light slightly discoloured
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing All tyres (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
All tyres more than 10 years old
Offside Front Seat belt slightly damaged (7.1.2 (b) (i))
Rear fog light slightly discoloured
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing ALL (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Windscreen wiper blade defective both front (3.4 (b) (i))
under vehicle covered in underseal
Rear fog light slightly discoloured
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing All tyres (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Windscreen wiper blade defective Both front (3.4 (b) (i))
underside of vehicle covered in underseal
Nearside Stop lamp(s) all not working (4.3.1 (a) (iii)) DANGEROUS
Rear fog light slightly discoloured
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing All tyres (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Windscreen wiper blade defective Both front (3.4 (b) (i))
underside of vehicle covered in underseal
Central Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Central Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced tow bar mounting area (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both front tyres cracking on sidewalls (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Front Windscreen wiper blade defective both front wiper blades leaving smearing on screen (3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm attachment bracket/mounting corroded but its strength is not seriously reduced (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced body to chassis mount (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced body to chassis mount (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both rear tyres cracked on sidewalls (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both rear tyres worn on edges (5.2.3 (e))
underside of car covered in undearseal
Central Rear Brake hose ferrule excessively corroded front to rear axle line brake hose (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrier (4.13 (a) (i))
Central Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Central Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced tow bar mounting area (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both front tyres cracking on sidewalls (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Front Windscreen wiper blade defective both front wiper blades leaving smearing on screen (3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm attachment bracket/mounting corroded but its strength is not seriously reduced (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced body to chassis mount (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced body to chassis mount (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both rear tyres cracked on sidewalls (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both rear tyres worn on edges (5.2.3 (e))
underside of car covered in undearseal
Cracks on tyre sidewall, O/S/F and N/S/F
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
cracks on tyre sidewall and in tread, N/S/R and O/S/R
Battery insecure and likely to fall from carrier (4.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
rear chassis corroded
nearside rear panel underside corroded and holed beside step mounting points
Offside Drag link end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
Offside Front Seat belt cut but webbing not significantly weakened (5.2.2a)
oil leak at engine
slight corrosion on both rear discs inner faces
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
How Reliable is the Land Rover Defender?
Based on 2,960,045 MOT tests across 181,953 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
BV52 KCJ is a 2002 Land Rover Defender in Red with a 2,495cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 79.2%.
Across all 2002 Land Rover Defender models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.1% with a typical mileage of 91,689 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Land Rover Defender fails its MOT is shock absorber has an excessively worn bush, accounting for 77,499 recorded failures. If you're considering buying BV52 KCJ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Land Rover Defender typically stays on UK roads for around 43 years. At 24 years old, this Land Rover Defender is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of BV52 KCJ?
You can check the full history of BV52 KCJ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was BV52 KCJ registered?
BV52 KCJ is a 2002 Land Rover Defender, first registered on 11 September 2002.
Is BV52 KCJ safe to buy?
The MOT history for BV52 KCJ shows 24 tests with a 79.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does BV52 KCJ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on BV52 KCJ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.