MOT Status
ValidMileage
86,605 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Corrosion to both front lower inner wings.
General underbody corrosion.
Nearside Rear Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Lower rear outer sill, behind rear wheel. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Floor pan. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Lower rear outer sill, behind rear wheel. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Corrosion to both lower front sections of front wings.
General under body corrosion.
Offside Front Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Floor pan. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Horn not working (7.7 (a))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Inner/outer sill. (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Parking brake lever has excessive movement indicating incorrect adjustment (1.1.6 (c))
Corrosion to both lower front sections of front wings.
General under body corrosion.
Offside Front Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Floor pan. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement 'D' bush mounting rubbers weak on both sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive rear of the offside sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
general corrosion on the arch's and underside
handbrake operation near the end of its travel
offside floor corroded/weak but not excessive or in prescribed area's
Nearside Rear Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement 'D' bush mounting rubbers weak on both sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive rear of the offside sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
general corrosion on the arch's and underside
handbrake operation near the end of its travel
offside floor corroded/weak but not excessive or in prescribed area's
Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement mounting rubbers weak (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive rear of the offside sill corroded (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
general corrosion on the arch's and underside
handbrake operation near the end of its travel
offside floor corroded but not in prescribed areas
Coolant leak various places ()
front bumper supports corroded not in prescribed area
o/s/f floor corroded not in prescribed area
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength inner arch back of wheel (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength sill end area (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength inner arch rear of wheel (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength sill end area (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Coolant leak various places ()
front bumper supports corroded not in prescribed area
o/s/f floor corroded not in prescribed area
Offside Front Road wheel with a slightly distorted bead rim (4.2.A.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
nearside front tyre is showing signs of perishing.
offside headlamp has a stonechip in.
Brake fluid warning lamp illuminated (3.6.G.2)
Hazard warning lamps inoperative all lamps (1.4.B.1b)
Hazard warning switch faulty (1.4.B.1d)
Hazard warning tell tale not working correctly (1.4.B.1e)
Offside Rear Direction indicator not working (1.4.A.2c)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.C.1b)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Offside Front Road wheel with a slightly distorted bead rim (4.2.A.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
nearside front tyre is showing signs of perishing.
offside headlamp has a stonechip in.
How Reliable is the Toyota MR2?
Based on 602,130 MOT tests across 48,586 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
C109 CKJ is a 1985 Toyota MR2 in Red with a 1,587cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 11 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 63.6%.
Across all 1985 Toyota MR2 models, the average MOT pass rate is 68.3% with a typical mileage of 107,432 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Toyota MR2 fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 36,842 recorded failures. If you're considering buying C109 CKJ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota MR2 typically stays on UK roads for around 40 years. At 41 years old, this Toyota MR2 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of C109 CKJ?
You can check the full history of C109 CKJ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was C109 CKJ registered?
C109 CKJ is a 1985 Toyota MR2, first registered on 17 September 1985.
Is C109 CKJ safe to buy?
The MOT history for C109 CKJ shows 11 tests with a 63.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does C109 CKJ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on C109 CKJ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.