MOT Status
ValidMileage
132,574 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Coil spring corroded both rear (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Coil spring corroded poor condition (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Road wheel slightly distorted o/s/f repaired (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect both front poor condition (5.3.2 (d))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened front and rear badly corroded. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front lower arm rear bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both rear trailing arm bushes worn and poor. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
steering rough noise on steering.
various bushes worn
various components corroded.exhaust corroded.various underbody corrosion fuel tank straps badly corroded poor condition
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm badly worn on inner edge very poor condition (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Coil spring corroded both rear (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Coil spring corroded poor condition (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Road wheel slightly distorted o/s/f repaired (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge badly worn on inner edge very poor condition (5.2.3 (e))
Shock absorbers has a reduced damping effect both front poor condition (5.3.2 (d))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened front and rear badly corroded. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front lower arm rear bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both rear trailing arm bushes worn and poor. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both rear badly perished poor condition (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
steering rough noise on steering.
various bushes worn
various components corroded.exhaust corroded.various underbody corrosion fuel tank straps badly corroded poor condition
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.2.2 (g))
Rear Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Exhaust mounting defective corroded (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Road wheel slightly distorted on inner side (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Nail in tyre
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
fuel tank tray corroded
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt insecure (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Front Exhaust mounting defective corroded (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Road wheel slightly distorted on inner side (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Nail in tyre
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
fuel tank tray corroded
Front Exhaust mounting defective front bracket corroded through (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Road wheel slightly distorted (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Nearside Front tyre wearing on edges
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively slight wear lip on front brake discs (1.1.14 (a) (i))
fuel metal tank cover heavily corroded
Central Exhaust mounting defective (6.1.2 (a))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged on outer wall (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Nail in tyre
Central Exhaust mounting defective (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Outer Tyre slightly damaged Sidewall (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Wheel repaired
Nearside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Central Exhaust mounting defective (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Outer Tyre slightly damaged Sidewall (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Wheel repaired
Nearside Front Outer Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front inside wheel rim has had weld repair.
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Outer Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front inside wheel rim has had weld repair.
Offside Rear Electrical wiring inadequately secured (4.11 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
oil level is on minimum
Offside Front tyre wearing low
Nearside Rear Road wheel fixing missing (5.2.1 (a) (i))
How Reliable is the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Based on 1,338,871 MOT tests across 148,782 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
C10 ECJ is a 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque in Grey with a 2,179cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.4%.
Across all 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque models, the average MOT pass rate is 82.1% with a typical mileage of 70,339 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque fails its MOT is brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick, accounting for 6,504 recorded failures. If you're considering buying C10 ECJ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque typically stays on UK roads for around 15 years. At 14 years old, this Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of C10 ECJ?
You can check the full history of C10 ECJ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was C10 ECJ registered?
C10 ECJ is a 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, first registered on 27 October 2012.
Is C10 ECJ safe to buy?
The MOT history for C10 ECJ shows 19 tests with a 68.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does C10 ECJ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on C10 ECJ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.