MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
163,020 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
(Body condition:corrosion around the car There must be no dangerous sharp edges or projections)
Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
(Body condition:corrosion around the car There must be no dangerous sharp edges or projections)
Front Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e))
Front Oil leaking excessively from engine sump area (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Fuel pipe leaking Fuel pipe leak excessively or a risk of fire (6.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded so that its cross sectional area is reduced and seriously weakened (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Outer Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded so that its cross sectional area is reduced and seriously weakened (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded and seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage likely to become detached (5.3.3 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage likely to become detached (5.3.3 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage likely to become detached (5.3.3 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage likely to become detached (5.3.3 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Body condition:corrosion around the car There must be no dangerous sharp edges or projections
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Corroded, structural rigidity not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Child seat fitted to n/s/r
Earth lead to chassie from battery broken
Most front and rear suspension bushes splitting and perished
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage worn but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage worn but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Suspension components rusty esp rear coil springs
Underneath of vehicle very rusty
corrosion by drivers door catch
front brake rise slightly uneven
front wipers poor
o/s/f brake pad approx. 75% worn
oil leaks from engine, gearbox and rear diff
slight drag on o/s/f brake
upper screen tint fitted
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Rear Passenger's seat cannot be secured in the upright position. (6.2.A.2)
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Child seat fitted to n/s/r
Earth lead to chassie from battery broken
Most front and rear suspension bushes splitting and perished
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage worn but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage worn but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Suspension components rusty esp rear coil springs
Underneath of vehicle very rusty
corrosion by drivers door catch
front brake rise slightly uneven
front wipers poor
o/s/f brake pad approx. 75% worn
oil leaks from engine, gearbox and rear diff
slight drag on o/s/f brake
upper screen tint fitted
Offside oil leaks
both front anti roll bar link are badly perished
exhaust is rusty
f/n/s flexible brake hose is perished
f/o/s brake dragging slight
play noted in column
rear anti roll bar links are poor
underside very rusty in places esp sills
windscreen damaged o/s
Nearside Rear coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Offside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Front suspension has excessive play in a lower suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
Offside Front suspension has excessive play in a upper suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
Offside oil leaks
both front anti roll bar link are badly perished
exhaust is rusty
f/n/s flexible brake hose is perished
f/o/s brake dragging slight
play noted in column
rear anti roll bar links are poor
underside very rusty in places esp sills
windscreen damaged o/s
Battery insecure (1.9.1)
Nearside Front suspension has excessive play in a lower suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Nearside Rear coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Offside Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Front suspension has excessive play in a lower suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
Offside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
both front anti-roll bar link arm bushes badly perished
both rear anti-roll bar link arm bushes badly perished
f/n/s flexi brake hose perished
f/o/s brake draging
r/n/s inner sill noted very rusty
r/n/s outer sill outer skin starting to fracture
r/o/s outer sill noted very soft
steering colum worn
Oil leak
Nearside Front Ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
Offside Front Steering rack gaiter split (2.2.D.2d)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Power steering inoperative (2.3.3a)
Oil leak
Oil leak
Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear coil spring fractured (2.4.C.1a)
Oil leak
Centre Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Battery insecure
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
full inspection of under body components not possible gerase covered.
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Battery insecure
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Oil leak
full inspection of brake pipes not possible, grease covered.
Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Nearside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Nearside Rear rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
Offside Front Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Rear rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7) DANGEROUS
Battery insecure
Front Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
anti-rollbar bushes worn . All shocker bushes worn
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
osr foot brake poor
How Reliable is the Toyota Celica?
Based on 870,417 MOT tests across 67,994 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
C200 LVO is a 1985 Toyota Celica in Red with a 2,759cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 59.1%.
Across all 1985 Toyota Celica models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.2% with a typical mileage of 103,711 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Toyota Celica fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 43,337 recorded failures. If you're considering buying C200 LVO, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota Celica typically stays on UK roads for around 36 years. At 41 years old, this Toyota Celica is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of C200 LVO?
You can check the full history of C200 LVO by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was C200 LVO registered?
C200 LVO is a 1985 Toyota Celica, first registered on 1 August 1985.
Is C200 LVO safe to buy?
The MOT history for C200 LVO shows 22 tests with a 59.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does C200 LVO have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on C200 LVO. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.