MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
33,038 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Central Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases EXHAUST JOINT (6.1.2 (a))
Front Brake indicates a slightly grabbing brake (1.2.1 (c))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced FRAME/SWINGARM (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swing arm corroded o/s (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Wheel spoke slightly corroded (5.2.2 (d))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swing arm corroded. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Wheel spoke slightly corroded (5.2.2 (d))
Steering headbearing slightly stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Rear Brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Front Wheel spoke slightly corroded (5.2.2 (d))
Rear Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swing arm corroded. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Road spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Wheel spoke slightly corroded (5.2.2 (d))
Steering headbearing slightly stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Front Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Offside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened swing arm corroded and repaired (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Motorcycle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced swing arm corroded. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Brake disc worn, but not excessively close to limit (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively close to limit (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit n/s and o/s pads corroded (1.1.13 (a))
Steering headbearing slightly stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Rear Brake indicates excessive fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Wheel bearing has excessive play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Steering headbearing slightly stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Rear Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Oil leak Engine ()
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1b)
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Front Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
Oil leak Engine ()
Front Floor brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.C2c)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) (sintered type) less than 1.0mm thick (3.2A1f(ii))
Rear Roller brake test indicates excessive fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Rear Wheel corroded significantly reducing the original strength (4.2.1a)
Front Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1a)
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Rear Wheel corroded but not significantly reducing the original strength (4.2.1a)
Front Headlamp incorrect colour (1.2.1)
Front Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1a)
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Rear Wheel corroded but not significantly reducing the original strength (4.2.1a)
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Rear Wheel corroded but not significantly reducing the original strength (4.2.1a)
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1b)
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1b)
Rear Wheel corroded but not significantly reducing the original strength (4.2.1a)
rim corroded around spoke holes and valve on rear wheel.
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Floor brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.C2c)
Exhaust is leaking but is not excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Exhaust slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Front Roller brake test indicates a slightly grabbing brake (3.3.A1b)
Drive chain excessively tight (6.2.1d)
Front Floor brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.C2c)
Front Roller brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.A1a)
Front wheel bearings are excessively rough (2.3.5b)
Front wheel bearings have excessive free play (2.3.5b)
Rear Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
front suspension noisey in operation.
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
front tyre has ozone cracking, but cords not exposed
How Reliable is the Honda XL650?
Based on 15,621 MOT tests across 1,262 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CA03 LNU is a 2003 Honda XL650 in Blue with a 649cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 28 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 67.9%.
Across all 2003 Honda XL650 models, the average MOT pass rate is 83.3% with a typical mileage of 19,970 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Honda XL650 fails its MOT is roller brake test indicates a binding brake, accounting for 212 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CA03 LNU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Honda XL650 typically stays on UK roads for around 26 years. At 23 years old, this Honda XL650 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CA03 LNU?
You can check the full history of CA03 LNU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CA03 LNU registered?
CA03 LNU is a 2003 Honda XL650, first registered on 1 August 2003.
Is CA03 LNU safe to buy?
The MOT history for CA03 LNU shows 28 tests with a 67.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CA03 LNU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CA03 LNU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.