MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
107,034 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Exhaust system insecure hanger before subframe broken (6.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Wheel bearing rough when rotated (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm corroded and seriously weakened spring cup holed (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn trailing arm bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength both n/s and o/s wheel arches holed (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement trailing arm bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
Oil leak, but not excessive at engine/ gbox (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened front and rear (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both disc inner faces poor (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both disc inner faces poor, advise to replace soon (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Slight brake judder on RBT noticed
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both spring cups (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Illegal on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Illegal on edge, nail in tyre also (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both discs (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Inner pads look low
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both arms corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened Both corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Washers lacking in strengh
General corrosion underneath
Nearside Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Slight fluctuation on brake test
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension component pin or bush slightly worn Both trailing arm bushes have wear (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both arms (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded Both springs at base (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both rear (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Exhaust mounting defective Mid pipe to backbox mount broken but exhaust secure (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 2.5mm and worn on inside (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 2.8mm and worn on inside (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin Rear inner pads look low (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing Both rear shocks corroded (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both rear trailing arm bushes starting to split (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Exhaust mounting defective Front mount at flexi cracked, mount onto backbox very thin (6.1.2 (a))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both front tyres worn on edges slightly (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Radius arm bush to body starting to split (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Radius arm bush to body starting to split (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Washers low pressure but still provide enough water to clear screen
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Cracked on inside tread (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Exhaust mounting defective Front mount at flexi cracked, mount onto backbox very thin (6.1.2 (a))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both front tyres worn on edges slightly (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Radius arm bush to body starting to split (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Radius arm bush to body starting to split (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Washers low pressure but still provide enough water to clear screen
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Inner face (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
O/s/r tyre cracked and n/s/f tyre cut on sidewall
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Slightly cracked both main bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
n/s/r tyre 3.3mm
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Rear Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
o/s/f tyre worn on inner edge
How Reliable is the Ford S-max?
Based on 1,368,227 MOT tests across 101,843 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CA10 NKF is a 2010 Ford S-max in Silver with a 1,997cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 81.3%.
Across all 2010 Ford S-max models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.2% with a typical mileage of 83,408 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford S-max fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 26,089 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CA10 NKF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford S-max typically stays on UK roads for around 20 years. At 16 years old, this Ford S-max is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CA10 NKF?
You can check the full history of CA10 NKF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CA10 NKF registered?
CA10 NKF is a 2010 Ford S-max, first registered on 2 July 2010.
Is CA10 NKF safe to buy?
The MOT history for CA10 NKF shows 16 tests with a 81.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CA10 NKF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CA10 NKF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.