MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
101,000 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Headlamp lens seriously defective No dip image (4.1.1 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced Sill closeing panel (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp lens seriously defective No dip image (4.1.1 (b) (ii))
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced Outer sill panel (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced Sill closeing panel (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Low effort n/s rear (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Brake pedal wearing smooth (1.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Suspension rod pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Tie rod bush spliting (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Slightly scored drivers side (3.2 (a) (i))
2 x headlamps slightly poor output / image....plastic outer lens deteriorated....
Foot brake pedal grip pad worn....
Windscreen slight score marks centre and offside....
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Front front brake application uneven offside much lower effort....35% (3.7.B.2)
Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded outer sill at centre and rear.... (5.2.6)
Offside Rear Rear wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.6.1)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm inner Very worn.... (4.1.E.1)
Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded outer sill centre area.... (5.2.6)
Offside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed 155/65/13... (4.1.D.1b) DANGEROUS
2 x headlamps slightly poor output / image....plastic outer lens deteriorated....
Foot brake pedal grip pad worn....
Windscreen slight score marks centre and offside....
Bonnet retaining device slightly deteriorated (8.4.2)
Brake pedal rubber worn
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Offside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Oil leak ()
Screen scored
Exhaust emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (7.3.D.3)
Front front brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too high and too far to the right. (1.8)
Offside Rear rear brake binding Wheel bearing not checked (3.7.B.1)
Rear rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Bonnet retaining device slightly deteriorated (8.4.2)
Brake pedal rubber worn
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Offside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Oil leak ()
Screen scored
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights ()
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear wheel bearing has slight play (2.6.2)
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.2.6)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7) DANGEROUS
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Offside Rear Trailing arm corroded and seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Offside rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Offside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7) DANGEROUS
engine management light on brake pedal rubber split
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
front brake pads low
o/s/r tyre close to border line
slight noise from o/s/r wheel when rotated
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Daewoo Matiz?
Based on 724,041 MOT tests across 61,622 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CA54 KUH is a 2004 Daewoo Matiz in Silver with a 995cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 61.1%.
Across all 2004 Daewoo Matiz models, the average MOT pass rate is 68.6% with a typical mileage of 41,055 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Daewoo Matiz fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,507 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CA54 KUH, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Daewoo Matiz typically stays on UK roads for around 28 years. At 22 years old, this Daewoo Matiz is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CA54 KUH?
You can check the full history of CA54 KUH by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CA54 KUH registered?
CA54 KUH is a 2004 Daewoo Matiz, first registered on 30 November 2004.
Is CA54 KUH safe to buy?
The MOT history for CA54 KUH shows 18 tests with a 61.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CA54 KUH have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CA54 KUH. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.