MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
201,589 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both rear (5.2.3 (e))
general corrosion noticed and advised
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp does not illuminate (1.6 (a))
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Seat belt installation allows in excess of 25mm movement at a looped belt anchorage centre seat belt (10.1 (r))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Upper Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Rear o/s/rear door corroded
Rear n/s /r and o/s/rear wheel arches corroded
Rear n/s rear and o/s/rear chassis corroded
Nearside Rear Body component corroded and likely to cause injury body seal is corroded rear and middle (6.2.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Rear Body component corroded and likely to cause injury body seal is corroded rear middle (6.2.1 (a) (i))
Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick o/s/r and n/s/r (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened o/s/f and n/s/f (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output o/s/f and n/s/f (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Rear Non obligatory mirror damaged ()
Nearside Rear Lower Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced lower outer seal and rear wheel arch (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Lower Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced lower outer seal and rear wheel arch (6.1.1 (c) (i))
o/s/r arch rust n/s/r arch has rust n/s/f tyre wearing on inner edge
Offside Front Vehicle structure has slight corrosion +MIDDLE OUTER SILL (6.1.B.2)
Rear Vehicle structure has slight corrosion both sides(arch). (6.1.B.2)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Windscreen has damage to an area in excess of a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Lower Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
both front tyres worn on edges
exhaust system corroded
All brake calipers have brake fluid residue
Exhaust down pipe not fully secured
Nail in offside front tyre
Nearside Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Parking brake lever ratchet mechanism is slightly worn (3.1.5)
Exhaust catalytic converter missing where one was fitted as standard (7.1.3)
Offside Rear Mechanical brake component has restricted free movement (3.5.1k)
All brake calipers have brake fluid residue
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Exhaust down pipe not fully secured
Nail in offside front tyre
Nearside Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Parking brake lever ratchet mechanism is slightly worn (3.1.5)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Nail in offside front tyre
Nail in offside rear tyre
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
handbrake cable assembly tight
Nail in nearside rear tyre
Nail in offside front tyre
Nearside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Screw in O/S/F tyre
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
nearside rear tyre wearing low on outer tread edge.
Front registration plate deteriorated (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear coil spring incomplete (2.4.C.1a)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
nearside rear tyre wearing low on outer tread edge.
bonnet release cable adrift from release handle.
both front tyres wearing on outer edges.
How Reliable is the Mercedes-benz Vito?
Based on 2,011,702 MOT tests across 164,434 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CB54 CES is a 2005 Mercedes-benz Vito in Silver with a 2,148cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2005 Mercedes-benz Vito models, the average MOT pass rate is 68.7% with a typical mileage of 113,960 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mercedes-benz Vito fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 49,564 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CB54 CES, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mercedes-benz Vito typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 21 years old, this Mercedes-benz Vito is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CB54 CES?
You can check the full history of CB54 CES by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CB54 CES registered?
CB54 CES is a 2005 Mercedes-benz Vito, first registered on 12 January 2005.
Is CB54 CES safe to buy?
The MOT history for CB54 CES shows 21 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CB54 CES have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CB54 CES. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.