MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
139,700 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Exhaust back box corroded
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear trailing arm front bushes worn/splitting
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Split (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working Sidelamp (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Position lamp not working Sidelamp (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Exhaust back box corroded
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear trailing arm front bushes worn/splitting
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated starting to crack (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt starting to crack (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Offside Headlamp lens seriously defective cloudy (4.1.1 (b) (ii))
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Headlamp lens seriously defective cloudy (4.1.1 (b) (ii))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Rear Seat belt not functioning as intended Both rearmost buckles inaccessible due to luggage (7.1.2 (c))
Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps Both sides (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated starting to crack (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt starting to crack (2.1.3 (g) (i))
225/55/18 x 4,,((0.60)) internal h/fan on constant?..
Front Headlamp lens slightly defective NSF & OSF -PODOT (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt ()
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened Arm (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened Arm (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front suspension ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt BOTH (2.4.G.2)
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules BOTH (3.6.B.4e)
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt Both (2.4.G.2)
Front number plate cracked
Track rod end ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt Both (2.2.C.1c)
Both rear tyres are worn on inside edge
Front brake discs are worn
Nearside front tyre worn on outside edges
Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
How Reliable is the Mitsubishi Outlander?
Based on 726,436 MOT tests across 75,074 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CE09 JNV is a 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander in Black with a 1,968cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 86.7%.
Across all 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.0% with a typical mileage of 94,052 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Mitsubishi Outlander fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 4,278 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CE09 JNV, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mitsubishi Outlander typically stays on UK roads for around 22 years. At 17 years old, this Mitsubishi Outlander is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CE09 JNV?
You can check the full history of CE09 JNV by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CE09 JNV registered?
CE09 JNV is a 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander, first registered on 30 April 2009.
Is CE09 JNV safe to buy?
The MOT history for CE09 JNV shows 15 tests with a 86.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CE09 JNV have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CE09 JNV. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.