MOT Status
ValidMileage
51,298 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Service brake effort inadequate at a wheel (1.2.1 (a) (i))
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases Front flexi (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Rear Hydraulic fluid leaking excessively Brake (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive nearside outer sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive nearside outer sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (1.6 (b))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Rear Exhaust silencer slightly loose (8.1.1 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Upper Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both sides strut top cups and nuts corroded badly . (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Outer Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both sides sills corroded . (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. 25% recorded , maximum allowance is 30% . Offside effort is much lower than nearside effort . (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases Joint . (6.1.2 (a))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Trailing arm heavily corroded across . (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Upper Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both sides , strut top cups and retaining nuts also heavily corroded . (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. 27% recorded , maximum allowance is 30% , nearside effort is much lower than offside effort . (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Trailing arm heavily corroded across . (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Exhaust hydrocarbon content after 2nd fast idle exceeds manufacturer's specified limits (8.2.1.2 (a))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak Body of shock leaking through heavy corrosion to casing . (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Exhaust emissions likely to be affected by an exhaust leak (8.2.1.1 (b))
Front Upper Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both sides , strut top cups and retaining nuts also heavily corroded . (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing Shock absorber body corroded . (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. 27% recorded , maximum allowance is 30% , nearside effort is much lower than offside effort . (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Trailing arm heavily corroded across . (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Upper Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both front top strutt mountings have slight play. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both sides have heavy corrosion evident. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Front Upper Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both front top strutt mountings have slight play. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both sides have heavy corrosion evident. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Upper Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both sides retaining nuts and cups are extremely badly corroded , Offside strut top has movement from wear . (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective split (3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect shock absorber is noisy internally on compression (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened trailing arm corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Front Upper Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both sides retaining nuts and cups are extremely badly corroded , Offside strut top has movement from wear . (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective split (3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect shock absorber is noisy internally on compression (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. 29% recorded , maximum allowance is 30% . Note offside effort is lower than nearside effort (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened trailing arm corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Upper Macpherson strut mounting corroded but not seriously weakened both sides strut top cups and top nuts badly corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear bushes both sides (2.4.G.2)
Front both brakes binding slightly
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened worn (3.5.1i)
Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear bushes both sides (2.4.G.2)
Front both front brakes binding slightly
Nearside Rear slight noise from wheel bearing on rotation
Both front wipers deteriorated
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CE09 OCS is a 2009 Ford Ka in Black with a 1,242cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 71.4%.
Across all 2009 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.5% with a typical mileage of 50,765 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CE09 OCS, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 17 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CE09 OCS?
You can check the full history of CE09 OCS by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CE09 OCS registered?
CE09 OCS is a 2009 Ford Ka, first registered on 22 April 2009.
Is CE09 OCS safe to buy?
The MOT history for CE09 OCS shows 21 tests with a 71.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CE09 OCS have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CE09 OCS. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.