MOT Status
ValidMileage
95,732 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing all four tyres perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced general underside age related surface corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
under trays and covers fitted masking some testable items
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing All four tyres perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
covers fitted masking some testable items
nearside front lower arm ball joint slight seepage of grease
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively both (3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing All four tyres perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
covers fitted masking some testable items
nearside front lower arm ball joint slight seepage of grease
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive inner bay (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.1.2 (h))
Nearside Body component damaged and likely to cause injury mirror (6.2.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive inner bay (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Anti-lock braking system component slightly damaged (1.6 (e))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin both inner pads getting low (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front wing mirror cover damaged, not likely to cause injury with sharp edge
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (3.5.1i)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
front brake discs slightly corroded and worn
front pads appear worn
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
front pads appear worn
Windscreen has a sticker or other obstruction encroaching by more than 10mm within zone 'A' (8.3.1b)
ADVISE ON TRACKING CHECK / ADJUST DUE TO TYRE WEAR
BOTH FRONT TYRE WORN VERY CLOSE TO LEGAL LIMITS / BOTH TYRES JUST LEGAL AT 2.mm WORN ON OUTER EDGES / STRONG ADVISE TO REPLACE A.S.A.P......205 / 60 / 16 H
NEARSIDE REAR TYRE BECOMING CRACKED / PERISHED / WEARING CLOSE TO LEGAL LIMITS
SAT NAV BASE MAGNET STUCK ON LOWER / CENTRE SECTION OF SCREEN ADVISE TO REMOVE
How Reliable is the Mitsubishi Lancer?
Based on 382,912 MOT tests across 33,260 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CE10 RVW is a 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer in Grey with a 1,499cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 75%.
Across all 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer models, the average MOT pass rate is 76.4% with a typical mileage of 69,237 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mitsubishi Lancer fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 9,095 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CE10 RVW, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mitsubishi Lancer typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 16 years old, this Mitsubishi Lancer is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CE10 RVW?
You can check the full history of CE10 RVW by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CE10 RVW registered?
CE10 RVW is a 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer, first registered on 1 March 2010.
Is CE10 RVW safe to buy?
The MOT history for CE10 RVW shows 16 tests with a 75% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CE10 RVW have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CE10 RVW. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.