MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
88,000 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Headlamp damaged but light output not reduced 2both (1.7.5a)
Offside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area modified, but not inappropriately (2.4.A.3)
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive advise o/s n/s patchs on sills (5.2.6)
advise rear suspension welded patch covered in thick under seal
advise shock mounting welded and under sealed
advise sills welded patchs covered in paint and under seal
Rear Suspension arm fractured (2.4.G.1)
Front Headlamp damaged but light output not reduced 2both (1.7.5a)
Offside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area modified, but not inappropriately (2.4.A.3)
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive advise o/s n/s patchs on sills (5.2.6)
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded o/s n/s front to rear sill several places (5.2.6)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is fractured suspension arm (2.4.A.3) DANGEROUS
Front Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced both (1.7.5a)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area modified, but not inappropriately bottom shock mounting welded (2.4.A.3)
Rear advise slight brake drag both
chassy corroded
Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit both (4.1.E.1)
advise sills corroded not holed
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
advise smell of fuel but no signs of leak
Rear Trailing arm corroded and seriously weakened (2.4.G.1) DANGEROUS
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
advise smell of fuel but no signs of leak
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b) DANGEROUS
Nearside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Suspension arm corroded and seriously weakened (2.4.G.1) DANGEROUS
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
surface rust on underside of vehicle
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
front brake pads wearing low
nearside front tyre wearing on both inner and outer edges
offside front tyre wearing on inside
Brake performance not tested (3.7.A.1)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Nearside Rear Trailing arm corroded and seriously weakened (2.4.G.1) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Trailing arm corroded and seriously weakened (2.4.G.1) DANGEROUS
Oil leak
brake pad anti slip deterioated
centre exhaust slight blow
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
rear trailing arms corroded
rear trailing arms corroded
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
front brake pads wearing low
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
How Reliable is the Daewoo Matiz?
Based on 724,041 MOT tests across 61,622 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CE54 SXD is a 2004 Daewoo Matiz in Silver with a 995cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 64.7%.
Across all 2004 Daewoo Matiz models, the average MOT pass rate is 68.6% with a typical mileage of 41,055 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Daewoo Matiz fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,507 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CE54 SXD, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Daewoo Matiz typically stays on UK roads for around 28 years. At 22 years old, this Daewoo Matiz is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CE54 SXD?
You can check the full history of CE54 SXD by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CE54 SXD registered?
CE54 SXD is a 2004 Daewoo Matiz, first registered on 6 September 2004.
Is CE54 SXD safe to buy?
The MOT history for CE54 SXD shows 17 tests with a 64.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CE54 SXD have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CE54 SXD. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.