MOT Status
ValidMileage
70,953 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
heavy corrosion rear suspension beam
both front suspension arms bushes perished
heavy corrosion exhaust system
heavy corrosion rear suspension beam and coils springs
heavy corrosion exhaust system
heavy corrosion rear suspension beam
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
exhaust back box corroded
rear axle corroded
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush upper bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
exhaust back box corroded
rear axle corroded
Front Coil spring corroded both sides (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Upper Macpherson strut mounting corroded but not seriously weakened mounting inner wings (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front accident damage to front bumper/wings. n/s lower sill
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Coil spring corroded both sides (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear exhaust system deteriorating
Front Inner Brake disc significantly and obviously worn both sides (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm both sides (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Front Coil spring corroded both sides (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Upper Macpherson strut mounting corroded but not seriously weakened mounting inner wings (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front accident damage to front bumper/wings. n/s lower sill
Nearside Rear Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Coil spring corroded both sides (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear exhaust system deteriorating
front inner brake discs corroded
front top shock mounts corroded
offside rear tyre perished
rear axle corroded
rear exhaust box corroded
sump corroded and leaking slightly
Offside Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
front inner brake discs corroded
front top shock mounts corroded
offside rear tyre perished
rear axle corroded
rear exhaust box corroded
sump corroded and leaking slightly
Offside Rear Service brake has no recorded effort at a wheel (1.2.1 (a) (ii))
Front inner discs corroded
Offside rear winter tyre fitted and perished
Rear exhaust box corroded
Offside rear service brake figures only just met minimum requirements
Nearside Rear Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
exhaust back box coroded
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
exhaust back box coroded
Front coil spring corroded both sides (2.4.C.1b)
exhaust tail box deteriorating
exhaust tail box deteriorating
Front coil spring corroded both sides (2.4.C.1b)
Nearside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Nail in offside rear tyre
accident damage to o/s/f
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CE59 TUA is a 2009 Ford Ka in Red with a 1,242cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.4%.
Across all 2009 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.5% with a typical mileage of 50,765 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CE59 TUA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 17 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CE59 TUA?
You can check the full history of CE59 TUA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CE59 TUA registered?
CE59 TUA is a 2009 Ford Ka, first registered on 16 September 2009.
Is CE59 TUA safe to buy?
The MOT history for CE59 TUA shows 19 tests with a 68.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CE59 TUA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CE59 TUA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.