MOT Status
ValidMileage
49,706 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Front Brake master cylinder/servo mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner wheel arch area (1.1.21 (e) (i))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened nsf osf upper and lower arms corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Brake master cylinder/servo mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive inner arch area corroded (1.1.21 (e) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened nsr osr upper and lower arm corroded close on limit (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive ns and os inner sills corroded (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Suspension component mounting repair covered in underseal both rear sills have signs of filler (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing osf and rear tyres cracking (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge rear tyres worn (5.2.3 (e))
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced nsf osf inner arches corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced outer and inner sills corroded signs of filler and repair (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both (5.2.3 (e))
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened all rear arm corroded close on limit in part / front arm corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened front and rear steering and suspension corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing fronts (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced nsf osf inner arches corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced outer and inner sills corroded signs of filler and repair (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both (5.2.3 (e))
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened all rear arm corroded close on limit in part / front arm corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened front and rear steering and suspension corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing fronts (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced sill holed at the rear (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced sill holed at the rear (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive BOTH SILLS (5.3.6 (a) (i))
BOTH REAR SILLS CORRODED !!
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Service brake has no recorded effort at a wheel (1.2.1 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
BOTH REAR SILLS CORRODED !!
Rear Outer BOTH SILL CORRODED
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
How Reliable is the Mazda MX-5?
Based on 2,502,760 MOT tests across 160,823 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CF03 CKJ is a 2003 Mazda MX-5 in Blue with a 1,839cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 83.3%.
Across all 2003 Mazda MX-5 models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.2% with a typical mileage of 60,251 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Mazda MX-5 fails its MOT is seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 44,475 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CF03 CKJ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda MX-5 typically stays on UK roads for around 36 years. At 23 years old, this Mazda MX-5 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CF03 CKJ?
You can check the full history of CF03 CKJ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CF03 CKJ registered?
CF03 CKJ is a 2003 Mazda MX-5, first registered on 30 July 2003.
Is CF03 CKJ safe to buy?
The MOT history for CF03 CKJ shows 24 tests with a 83.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CF03 CKJ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CF03 CKJ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.