MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
79,215 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
corrosion starting on both front 'A' pillars
corrosion starting on both front underfloors
corrosion starting on offside rear chassis rail
Inner Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
corrosion starting on both front 'A' pillars
corrosion starting on both front underfloors
corrosion starting on offside rear chassis rail
both front flexy brake pipes deteriorated
corrosion in offside rear chassis
corrosion showing in front floor panels
corrosion showing in inner sills
corrosion showing in outer sills
rear axle bushes deteriorated
Nearside Front Macpherson strut has excessive movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Offside Front Macpherson strut has excessive movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
both front flexy brake pipes deteriorated
corrosion in offside rear chassis
corrosion showing in front floor panels
corrosion showing in inner sills
corrosion showing in outer sills
rear axle bushes deteriorated
Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
both inner+outer sills,floor pans,rear chassis,rear wheelbox/wheel arch etc showing corrosion/corroded/corroded on limit
n/s rear tyre has a slight lump to outer sidewall
Nearside Rear coil spring incomplete (2.4.C.1a)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
both inner+outer sills,floor pans,rear chassis,rear wheelbox/wheel arch etc showing corrosion/corroded/corroded on limit
n/s rear tyre has a slight lump to outer sidewall
corrosion showing in both inner and outer rear sills
nearside front wishbone bushes deteriorated
offside and nearside front upper strut top mountings have slight free play
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Front brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
corrosion showing in both inner and outer rear sills
nearside front wishbone bushes deteriorated
offside and nearside front upper strut top mountings have slight free play
Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
bat light on
both inner+outer sills+floor pans showing slight corrosion/corroded
both wiper blades split
front brake discs slightly deteriorated
n/s front lower suspension arm bushes slightly deteriorated
o/s front lower supension arm rear bush slightly deteriorated+front bush deteriorated
o/s rear tyre getting lower+slightly perrished
Offside Rear coil spring cracked (2.4.C.1a)
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
bat light on
both inner+outer sills+floor pans showing slight corrosion/corroded
both wiper blades split
front brake discs slightly deteriorated
n/s front lower suspension arm bushes slightly deteriorated
o/s front lower supension arm rear bush slightly deteriorated+front bush deteriorated
o/s rear tyre getting lower+slightly perrished
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
n/s/f suspension arm rear bush starting to displace.
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Rear position lamp(s) excessively deteriorated so that it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.1.A.3d)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
n/s/f suspension arm rear bush starting to displace.
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
both front brake discs slightly worn.
both rear suspension top mount slightly worn.
o/s/f wishbone rear bush starting to displace.
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CF03 RNE is a 2003 Ford Ka in Blue with a 1,299cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 60%.
Across all 2003 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 66.4% with a typical mileage of 47,451 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CF03 RNE, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 23 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CF03 RNE?
You can check the full history of CF03 RNE by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CF03 RNE registered?
CF03 RNE is a 2003 Ford Ka, first registered on 22 August 2003.
Is CF03 RNE safe to buy?
The MOT history for CF03 RNE shows 15 tests with a 60% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CF03 RNE have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CF03 RNE. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.