MOT Status
ValidMileage
95,848 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Nearside Front Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Front Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
exhaust blow from center section of exhaust
nearside front tyre perished
Rear Coil spring corroded both sides (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Exhaust Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (8.2.1.2 (c))
Front Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases joint (6.1.2 (a))
Rear Coil spring corroded both sides (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Inner Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Clip looks insecure (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases Exhaust flexi pipe (6.1.2 (a))
Exhaust mounting defective Centre exhaust hanger has corroded away (6.1.2 (a))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Central Front Lower Exhaust mounting defective Corroded away from system and is putting extra strain on the flexible section which is in very poor condition (6.1.2 (a))
Central Lower Exhaust silencer outer skin peeling away
Central Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. Condition of brake discs (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Outer Integral body structure is deformed but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Sill dented (6.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Outer Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Surface has a wide corrosion band formed (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Beam axle (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Central Parking brake lever has excessive movement indicating incorrect adjustment Comes all the way up to the stop and and met brake efficiency by 1% (1.1.6 (c))
Central Front Lower Exhaust mounting defective Corroded away from system and is putting extra strain on the flexible section which is in very poor condition (6.1.2 (a))
Central Lower Exhaust silencer outer skin peeling away
Central Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. Condition of brake discs (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Outer Integral body structure is deformed but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Sill dented (6.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Outer Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Surface has a wide corrosion band formed (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre obviously under inflated (5.2.3 (l))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Beam axle (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Exhaust centre silencer peeling
Nearside Front Outer body sill damaged
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Exhaust centre silencer peeling
Nearside Front Outer body sill damaged
Central exhaust silencer corroded and peeling
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn Rear Bush - arm resting on subframe (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect both sides (5.3.2 (b))
front tyres wearing on inner edges
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect both sides (5.3.2 (b))
front tyres wearing on inner edges
both front tyres inner edges worn smooth close to showing cords
front brake disks showing corrosion
front pads low
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
n/s/f tyre wearing on the inner edges.
o/s/f tyre wearing bad on the inner edges,recommend changing.
How Reliable is the Fiat 500 C?
Based on 67,982 MOT tests across 4,583 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CJ12 FUN is a 2012 Fiat 500 C in Blue with a 875cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2012 Fiat 500 C models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.2% with a typical mileage of 46,484 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Fiat 500 C fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 615 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CJ12 FUN, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Fiat 500 C typically stays on UK roads for around 17 years. At 14 years old, this Fiat 500 C is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CJ12 FUN?
You can check the full history of CJ12 FUN by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CJ12 FUN registered?
CJ12 FUN is a 2012 Fiat 500 C, first registered on 23 March 2012.
Is CJ12 FUN safe to buy?
The MOT history for CJ12 FUN shows 18 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CJ12 FUN have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CJ12 FUN. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.