MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
75,099 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded bay (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Outer Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded sill (5.2.6)
Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded under sill (5.2.6)
Offside Outer Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded sill (5.2.6)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded chassis (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded under sill (2.4.A.3)
Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded under sill (5.2.6)
Nearside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded floor, few points (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Front Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner arch (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Outer Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded sill , few points (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded middle floor (5.2.6)
Offside Front Brake hose excessively deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded floor few points (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner arch, few points (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded sill, few points (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded under body sill (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded boot floor (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner arch, few points (2.4.A.3)
Power steering component(s) leaking from a failed seal steering rack (2.3.3b)
Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded center floor , in 2 points (2.4.A.3)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc modified but not seriously weakened (3.5.1n)
front chassis corroeded
o/s rear lens
Nearside Front lower arm inner front bush bonding showing deterioration
Nearside Front under sill showing corrosion
Offside Front under sill showing corrosion
Offside Rear Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings under sill holed (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Front lower arm inner front bush bonding showing deterioration
Nearside Front under sill showing corrosion
Offside Front under sill showing corrosion
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
n/s/r wheel bearing sound & roughness
n/s/f floor section showing corrosion & deteriation
o/s/f floor section showing corrosion & deteriation
above normal lift n/s/f top suspension mount
advise n/s/f steering rack inner joint above normal play
Offside Rear coil spring incomplete (2.4.C.1a) DANGEROUS
slight play n/s/f inner rack joint
above normal lift both front top suspension mounts
advise front brake pads & improve brakes 2,000 miles
above normal lift both front top mounts
above normal travel in foot brake pedal application
advise inspection front pads & bleed
Nearside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CK03 UXL is a 2003 Ford Ka in Blue with a 1,299cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.3%.
Across all 2003 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 66.4% with a typical mileage of 47,451 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CK03 UXL, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 23 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CK03 UXL?
You can check the full history of CK03 UXL by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CK03 UXL registered?
CK03 UXL is a 2003 Ford Ka, first registered on 30 April 2003.
Is CK03 UXL safe to buy?
The MOT history for CK03 UXL shows 15 tests with a 73.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CK03 UXL have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CK03 UXL. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.