MOT Status
ValidMileage
97,382 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material along rear Axle (1.1.11 (c))
Front suspension legs corroded both sides
Rear brake pipe slightly corroded along axle
Rear shock absorbers corroded both sides
oil sump corroded
Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush excessively worn offside front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Direction indicator incorrect colour offside front (4.4.3 (a))
Direction indicator incorrect colour offside rear (4.4.3 (a))
Headlamp aim too low offside (4.1.2 (a))
Macpherson strut top bush or bearing has excessive wear or free play nearside front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Position lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp offside rear (4.2.3 (c))
Suspension component insecurely attached both sides [stabiliser bars] front (5.3.3 (a) (i))
Direction indicator slightly discoloured nearside front (4.4.3 (a))
Direction indicator slightly discoloured nearside rear (4.4.3 (a))
Front suspension legs corroded both sides
Position lamp slightly affected by the operation of another lamp nearside rear (4.2.3 (c))
Rear brake pipe slightly corroded along axle
Rear shock absorbers corroded both sides
oil sump corroded
parking brake lever requires attention
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Horn not working (7.7 (a))
Nearside Front Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Position lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp both (4.2.3 (c))
Nearside Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Nearside Front Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Boot Insecure (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Offside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour Emitting white light (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Rear Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Registration plate inscription illegible Front and Rear Plates (0.1 (b))
Both rear tyres wearing outer edge.
Nearside Front Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot missing (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Nearside Front Track rod end slightly misaligned (2.1.3 (e))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both on edges (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
unable to check rear seat belts
Brake performance not tested due to front tyre condition (3.7.A.1)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b) DANGEROUS
Front tyres worn on edges
slight mist of oil around gearbox
Offside Rear Rear position lamp(s) damaged, but still visible from a reasonable distance (1.1.A.3d)
How Reliable is the Renault Twingo?
Based on 415,471 MOT tests across 31,687 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CK10 ERU is a 2010 Renault Twingo in White with a 1,149cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 71.4%.
Across all 2010 Renault Twingo models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.1% with a typical mileage of 49,033 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Renault Twingo fails its MOT is track rod end ball joint has excessive play, accounting for 7,998 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CK10 ERU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Renault Twingo typically stays on UK roads for around 19 years. At 16 years old, this Renault Twingo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CK10 ERU?
You can check the full history of CK10 ERU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CK10 ERU registered?
CK10 ERU is a 2010 Renault Twingo, first registered on 24 March 2010.
Is CK10 ERU safe to buy?
The MOT history for CK10 ERU shows 21 tests with a 71.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CK10 ERU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CK10 ERU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.