MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
128,784 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Electronic stability control warning lamp indicates a fault (7.12 (e))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced outer sill holed (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced lower wheelarch to inner arch corroded and holed (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength sill end corroded and holed - must be able to inspect repairs on retest (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced outer sill and floor holed (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength sill end corroded and holed - must be able to inspect repairs on restest (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Wheel bearing play so excessive that directional control is impaired (5.1.3 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Outer both front wings corroded but no sharp edges at time of test
Front Service brake imbalance requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. 25% recorded , maximum allowance is 30% , some of imbalance is being caused by offside front brake fluctuation (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Front Windscreen wiper blade defective both sides deteriorated (3.4 (b) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Vehicle generally corroded on underside , however unable to fully inspect sills , inner wheelarches and other areas due to arch guards , undertrays and sill covers . (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt ()
Offside Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively possibly being caused by wheel bearing about to collapse (1.2.1 (e))
Offside Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened worn (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Rear Exhaust mounting defective exhaust mounting above rear subframe has corroded and fallen off (6.1.2 (a))
Rear Fuel filler pipes badly corroded
Corrosion forming at underbody
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Nearside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b) DANGEROUS
Corrosion forming at underbody
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit heavily worn at inner edge (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit heavily worn at inner edge. (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a ball joint knocking when driven (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a ball joint knocking when driven (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit heavily worn at inner edge (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit heavily worn at inner edge. (4.1.E.1)
Electronic stability system warning lamp indicates a fault (3.4.1c)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7) DANGEROUS
both rear tyres wearing on inner edges.
offside rear tyre stepped on inner edge.
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
offside rear tyre stepped on inner edge.
Nearside Rear Lower Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Lower Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Exhaust system not adequately supported (7.1.1)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Lower Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Lower Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
both rear tyres wearing unevenly and close to limit.205/50zr17
os/r brake pad getting low.
ns/r and os/r tyres wearing on inside edges.
nsr and osr tyres wearing unevenly
FRONT BRAKE DISCS CORRODED INSIDE EDGE. BOTH REAR TYRES WEARING UNEVENLY ON INSIDE EGDGE. REAR EXHAUST MOUNT CORRODING
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Mazda 3?
Based on 2,040,939 MOT tests across 164,053 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CK54 NBZ is a 2004 Mazda 3 in Blue with a 1,999cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 63.2%.
Across all 2004 Mazda 3 models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.9% with a typical mileage of 69,720 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mazda 3 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 40,716 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CK54 NBZ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda 3 typically stays on UK roads for around 22 years. At 22 years old, this Mazda 3 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CK54 NBZ?
You can check the full history of CK54 NBZ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CK54 NBZ registered?
CK54 NBZ is a 2004 Mazda 3, first registered on 20 October 2004.
Is CK54 NBZ safe to buy?
The MOT history for CK54 NBZ shows 19 tests with a 63.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CK54 NBZ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CK54 NBZ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.