MOT Status
ValidMileage
138,750 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Central Front Obligatory mirror slightly damaged interior mirror (3.3 (b) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Inner Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced side sill corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Rear Lower Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced chassis (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear Towbar component corroded, but not excessively (6.1.6 (a))
Nearside Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn inner face of disc (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Inner Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength lower side sill, adjacent to nearside rear subframe mounting prescribed area (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced chassis holed (bump stop location) (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Wheel bearing has excessive play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn inner face of disc (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Central Front Obligatory mirror slightly damaged interior mirror (3.3 (b) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Inner Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced side sill corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Rear Lower Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced chassis (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear Towbar component corroded, but not excessively (6.1.6 (a))
Central Front Obligatory mirror slightly damaged deteriorated (3.3 (b) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Rear Lower Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced nearside and offside chassis (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Lower spare wheel cage corroded
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear exhaust system deteriorated
Rear nearside and offside bump stops missing
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Offside Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Inner Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced lower nearside and offside side sills corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
rear exhaust system deteriorated
Offside Front Lower Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn inner face of disc (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn inner face of disc (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Central Front Oil leak, but not excessive Oil leak bottom of engine. (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated The CV boot is also slightly loose. (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Rear Both rear brake backplates are corroding.
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Small split in dust cover. (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (i))
Nearside Front NSF outer CV boot insecure. Still serviceable and not allowing grease to escape.
Nearside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter insecure to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
offside/nearside rear brake discs slightly corroded
How Reliable is the Citroen C2?
Based on 965,161 MOT tests across 61,057 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CK57 RUR is a 2007 Citroen C2 in Black with a 1,560cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 84.2%.
Across all 2007 Citroen C2 models, the average MOT pass rate is 70.6% with a typical mileage of 56,920 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Citroen C2 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 38,269 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CK57 RUR, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Citroen C2 typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 19 years old, this Citroen C2 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CK57 RUR?
You can check the full history of CK57 RUR by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CK57 RUR registered?
CK57 RUR is a 2007 Citroen C2, first registered on 16 October 2007.
Is CK57 RUR safe to buy?
The MOT history for CK57 RUR shows 19 tests with a 84.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CK57 RUR have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CK57 RUR. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.