MOT Status
ValidMileage
133,150 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front upper spring seat corroding
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive inner wheel arch/chassis leg (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front upper spring seat corroding
Nearside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (4.4.3 (a))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front upper spring seat corroding
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive inner wheel arch/chassis leg (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front upper spring seat corroding
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Offside Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Oil leak, but not excessive sump corroded. (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear both rear brake hoses are not secured to the mounting brackets
Driver's view of the road through the swept area of the windscreen significantly affected by an obstruction air fresheners (3.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Offside Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Oil leak, but not excessive sump corroded. (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear both rear brake hoses are not secured to the mounting brackets
Nearside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule ferrule swollen under rubber sleeve,it could be weaken/have seen them break off.advise renewing. (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Offside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule rubber sleeve over ferrule swollen corrosion may have weaken ferrule,advise renrewing. (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Offside Front Shock absorbers has light misting of oil nearing limit. (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush near limit (5.3.2 (c))
Rear Exhaust silencer insecure clamp missing and on front pipe. (8.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule ferrule swollen under rubber sleeve,it could be weaken/have seen them break off.advise renewing. (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Offside Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule rubber sleeve over ferrule swollen corrosion may have weaken ferrule,advise renrewing. (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Offside Front Shock absorbers has light misting of oil nearing limit. (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush near limit (5.3.2 (c))
Front Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Service brake requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair (1.2.1 (c))
Rear axle corroded
Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened Both front suspension mounting nuts corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre not fitted in accordance with side wall instructions (5.2.3 (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened Both front suspension mounting nuts corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Rear axle slight corrosion
handbrake only just meeting minimum standard
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Rear axle slight corrosion
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
handbrake only just meeting minimum standard
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
n/s handbrake performance low
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength axle spring seat (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
n/s handbrake performance low
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm 195/50/15v (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nail in front tyre
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
exhaust system deteriorated
Front front brake excessively fluctuating (3.7.B.3)
Offside Mechanical brake component has restricted free movement (3.5.1k)
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CK59 MDF is a 2009 Ford Ka in Blue with a 1,242cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 65.2%.
Across all 2009 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.5% with a typical mileage of 50,765 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CK59 MDF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 17 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CK59 MDF?
You can check the full history of CK59 MDF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CK59 MDF registered?
CK59 MDF is a 2009 Ford Ka, first registered on 26 October 2009.
Is CK59 MDF safe to buy?
The MOT history for CK59 MDF shows 23 tests with a 65.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CK59 MDF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CK59 MDF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.