MOT Status
ValidMileage
112,387 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
n/s/r wheel arch damaged
park brake has limited reserve travel
rear brake discs dirt shields corroded insecure
Body damage to n/s/r sill
Both front suspension arms corroded
Both rear under sills corroded
Park brake travel is high
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Subframe components corroded/deteriorated
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Body damage to n/s/r sill
Both front suspension arms corroded
Both rear under sills corroded
Park brake travel is high
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Subframe components corroded/deteriorated
All front and rear suspension arms are corroded
Both rear under sills have surface corrosion
Coil spring corroded Both rear (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Park brake travel is high
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened Front and rear heavily corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both front arms front bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both front and near side rear all close too limit on inner edges of tread (5.2.3 (e))
Front Brakes imbalanced across an axle 42% (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Coil spring fractured or broken Top part of spring is missing (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension rod ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
All front and rear suspension arms are corroded
Both rear under sills have surface corrosion
Coil spring corroded Both rear (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Park brake travel is high
Rear Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened Front and rear heavily corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both front arms front bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both front and near side rear all close too limit on inner edges of tread (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Road wheel fixing missing (5.2.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge inner edge devoid of tread (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Brake fluid significantly below minimum mark (1.1.10 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Road wheel fixing missing all 4 wheels have a wheel nut missing (5.2.1 (a) (i))
Service brake efficiency below requirements (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Rear Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt ()
REVERSE LIGHT NOT WORKING
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Stop lamp not working HIGH LEVEL (1.2.1b)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Rear Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt ()
REVERSE LIGHT NOT WORKING
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit Inner tread (4.1.E.1)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit Inner tread (4.1.E.1)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
How Reliable is the Ford S-max?
Based on 1,368,227 MOT tests across 101,843 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CK60 WZU is a 2010 Ford S-max in Silver with a 1,997cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2010 Ford S-max models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.2% with a typical mileage of 83,408 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford S-max fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 26,089 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CK60 WZU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford S-max typically stays on UK roads for around 20 years. At 16 years old, this Ford S-max is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CK60 WZU?
You can check the full history of CK60 WZU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CK60 WZU registered?
CK60 WZU is a 2010 Ford S-max, first registered on 30 November 2010.
Is CK60 WZU safe to buy?
The MOT history for CK60 WZU shows 18 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CK60 WZU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CK60 WZU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.