MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
58,227 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Parking brake lever has excessive movement indicating incorrect adjustment (1.1.6 (c))
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced o/s outer metal sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge n/s front and n/s rear (5.2.3 (e))
heavy corrossion on rear subframe
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
heavy corrossion on rear suspension
Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Lower Suspension arm corroded and seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced o/s outer sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
heavy corrossion on rear suspension
corrossion on both metal outer sills
heavy corrossion on rear suspension
surface corrossion on front brake pipes
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Parking brake lever has excessive movement indicating incorrect adjustment (1.1.6 (c))
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced o/s outer metal sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
corrossion on both metal outer sills
heavy corrossion on rear suspension
surface corrossion on front brake pipes
Suspension arm ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt o/s front lower (2.4.G.2)
corrossion on both metal outer sills
corrossion on rear fuel pipes
corrossion on rear subframe and suspension
handbrake could do with adjustment
225 / 45 / 17 tyres fitted
Sill & inner wheel arch covers fitted
rear parking brake recording little or no effort Handbrake low (3.7.B.6a)
Sill & inner wheel arch covers fitted
225 / 45 / 17 tyres fitted
Exhaust emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (7.3.D.3)
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush Link bar (2.4.G.2)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Sill & inner wheel arch covers fitted
Items removed from driver's view prior to test
Oil leak
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Items removed from driver's view prior to test
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Oil leak
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Rear registration plate deteriorated (6.3.1d)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nail in offside rear tyre
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Rear Suspension arm has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
rear no.plate is in poor condition
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
both front discs badly pitted
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
both rear tyre perished badly
both rear tyres perished
Front registration plate character(s) likely to be misread (6.3.4b)
both rear tyres perished
Front registration plate character(s) likely to be misread (6.3.4b)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Jaguar X-type?
Based on 1,912,556 MOT tests across 119,397 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CN02 UPZ is a 2002 Jaguar X-type in Beige with a 2,099cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 63.6%.
Across all 2002 Jaguar X-type models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.5% with a typical mileage of 74,279 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Jaguar X-type fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 68,260 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CN02 UPZ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Jaguar X-type typically stays on UK roads for around 25 years. At 24 years old, this Jaguar X-type is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CN02 UPZ?
You can check the full history of CN02 UPZ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CN02 UPZ registered?
CN02 UPZ is a 2002 Jaguar X-type, first registered on 6 March 2002.
Is CN02 UPZ safe to buy?
The MOT history for CN02 UPZ shows 22 tests with a 63.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CN02 UPZ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CN02 UPZ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.