MOT Status
ValidMileage
53,355 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread Damaged (0.1 (b))
Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Under-Chassis Corrosion; Including Most Steering, Suspension Components And Sub-Frames
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Under-Body Corrosion; Including Most Suspension (Also Sub-Frames),Steering Components And Exhaust Mountings
Battery has slight movement - still secure in carrier
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread Slightly Damaged (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Suspension Components, Axle and Sub-Frame is Corroded
Offside Front Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Battery has slight movement - still secure in carrier
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread Slightly Damaged (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Suspension Components, Axle and Sub-Frame is Corroded
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
General underbody/suspension corrosion
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Both (1.1.11 (c))
Sill corrosion
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
General under body/suspension corrosion
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Both (1.1.11 (c))
Sill corrosion
Front number plate damage
General under body corrosion
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
surface corrosion to rear brakes
Front Number plate damage
Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
General under body corrosion
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Surface corrosion on all brake discs
Front number plate damage
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Front number plate damage
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Front number plate damage
Offside rear brake disc corroded
Front Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
both front brake discs slightly warped.
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Toyota Celica?
Based on 870,417 MOT tests across 67,994 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CN52 FSC is a 2002 Toyota Celica in Silver with a 1,794cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 87.5%.
Across all 2002 Toyota Celica models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.5% with a typical mileage of 85,197 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Toyota Celica fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 43,337 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CN52 FSC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota Celica typically stays on UK roads for around 36 years. At 24 years old, this Toyota Celica is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CN52 FSC?
You can check the full history of CN52 FSC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CN52 FSC registered?
CN52 FSC is a 2002 Toyota Celica, first registered on 1 September 2002.
Is CN52 FSC safe to buy?
The MOT history for CN52 FSC shows 24 tests with a 87.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CN52 FSC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CN52 FSC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.