MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
105,487 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Front suspension has excessive play in a lower suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
o/s and n/s sills and inner sills,underbody and rear beam all corroded
Nearside Inner Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded sill as chalked (5.2.6)
Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded outer sill as chalked (5.2.6)
Offside Inner Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded sill as chalked (5.2.6)
Offside Outer Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded sill as chalked (5.2.6)
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded chassis leg as chalked (5.2.6)
Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement n/s and o/s as chalked (2.4.G.2)
Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides (2.4.G.2)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front Lower Ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt BOTH SIDES (2.2.C.1c)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides (3.5.1i)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive BOTH REAR INNER SILLS (2.4.A.3)
Front Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded sill (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded sill (2.4.A.3)
Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides (2.4.G.2)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front Lower Ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt BOTH SIDES (2.2.C.1c)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides (3.5.1i)
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive BOTH REAR INNER SILLS (2.4.A.3)
Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a)
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a)
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Rear Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
both rear axle bushes worn
both rear ionner and outer sill corroded
fuel pipe corroded
nsr tyre worn
Offside Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
corrosion around battery clamp
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
How Reliable is the Mazda Demio?
Based on 136,409 MOT tests across 10,090 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CN52 OAV is a 2002 Mazda Demio in Silver with a 1,323cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.3%.
Across all 2002 Mazda Demio models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.2% with a typical mileage of 54,250 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mazda Demio fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 7,070 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CN52 OAV, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda Demio typically stays on UK roads for around 28 years. At 24 years old, this Mazda Demio is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CN52 OAV?
You can check the full history of CN52 OAV by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CN52 OAV registered?
CN52 OAV is a 2002 Mazda Demio, first registered on 27 September 2002.
Is CN52 OAV safe to buy?
The MOT history for CN52 OAV shows 15 tests with a 73.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CN52 OAV have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CN52 OAV. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.